• Red
    link
    fedilink
    101 year ago

    Icac says it does not want the DPP to consider prosecuting Berejiklian, despite ‘serious corrupt conduct’ finding…
    does not want the DPP to consider prosecuting Berejiklian…

    are you kidding me…

    • @tochee@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      8
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Plenty of corrupt conduct doesn’t quite meet the criminal standard. It’s one reason bodies like ICAC exist. In this instance, it seems like Berejiklian should have declared her conflict and recused herself from dealing with these grants. But did her relationship actually change how she acted on them? That’s harder to prove even if it was the case.

      Edit: this page has info on the elements that constitute criminal misconduct

      Edit2: oh yeah, ICAC also has coercive powers that allow it to get evidence that would be inadmissible in court. There’s probably a bunch of that here.

    • @Ascyron
      link
      31 year ago

      If her “deliberate … corrupt conduct” doesn’t meet the standard, in my eyes that means the standard is too high.

  • @No1@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    2
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Is now when we start getting the pitchforks out and start chanting “Lock her up!” ?

    • @TassieTosser@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      51 year ago

      No no no. You see she’s being a GIRLBOSS and GATEKEEPING the patriarchy from the halls of power. She’s a feminist icon for GASLIGHTING the ICAC, you can’t lock her up! It’d be a horrible example to all the little girls out there.