Affirmative Action has now ended in the United States.

  • qwerty@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Because available spots in colleges are limited in order to give to one group you have to take away from another, it’s a zero sum game. I don’t know what the right answer is but I know that treating asian kids worse because they are asian isn’t one. I also don’t belive that kids should suffer for the sins of their grandparents.

    Like I said I don’t know what the right answer is but I think offering scholarships to talented, hardworking kids who can’t afford to pay for school, regardless of race is a better solution than race based preferential treatment.

    • Favor@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      If kids shouldn’t suffer for the sins of their grandparents then why should other kids suffer for the sins committed against their grandparents?

      You can’t starve one man while feeding another for years, then give them both equal food for a few months and assume they’ll be even. You by necessity have to give the starving man more, and regardless of the fed man’s complaints it isn’t unfair for him to get less - he’s literally been getting more the whole time and is perfectly healthy.

    • revelrous@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      You have to take a step back and look at it on a bigger scale. The state caused generational harm. Kids are in worse positions because of what the state stole from their grandparents. I can’t look up stats on my phone, but it is a thing that is measurable.

      I definitely believe the poor need more resources, but it’s a different discussion from affirmative action.