A few days ago I sent a GDPR request to some company to delete my personal data. They said to install their app and send a ticket from the app. The email was sent from the email address to which the account is registered. Is this even legal?

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s way too easy to spoof email “from” addresses.

    There should be a way to do it through their website though. Requiring an app is just stupid.

    • wido@lemmy.tf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      They literally replied to his registered email and he has the reply. That would indicate that he has at least access to the account. So with OP’s next email quoting the reply ownership over the associated email address should be reasonably established.

        • nybble41@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          If you can read emails sent to a given address, and send replies from that address, it basically is your email address for all practical purposes no matter who was meant to be using the account. This is not necessarily a good thing and better end-to-end security would be nice but it is what it is. Odds are the app itself would let anyone change the password and log in provided they can read the emails, unless it’s using some form of 2FA.

    • My Password Is 1234@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Their site is just a landing page, there’s no login option or anything like that. Their business is a smartphone application.

      Edit: Gmail uses SPF, DMARC and DKIM signing so spoofing is not possible if their email services are configured properly.

      • Onioneer@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        SPF/DKIM/DMARC does not prevent sending the spoofed message, though. It is up to the recipient system to filter out the message should the checks fail. Even then, the message often lands into spam instead of being dropped.

        • My Password Is 1234@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Anyway they should configure their systems to reject unsigned e-mails and providers that don’t have a proper SPF configuration. SPF (Sender Policy Framework) allows you to make sure that the message was sent by an approved server and was not forged by some hackur.

          • fatalError@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            You’d be surprised how many legitimate email are sent with failed SPF. Even Microsoft sometimes doesn’t update their MX records and the SPF fails.

            • Onioneer@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              That is especially true with large organizations where multiple non-technical teams are ordering/configuring products that send email.

              Unfortunately it is difficult to solve, unless services stop allowing sending without verifying and forcing proper configuration. That would drive sales to competitors who do not enforce this, though.