(does not reflect my opinion, just thought it looked funny)

Less hostile when in context.

Taken from a YouTube channel called Not Just Bikes.

  • @brygphilomena@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    891 year ago

    Cars are already subject to noise restrictions. So effectively loud cars are banned. There is just little enforcement for most of it.

      • Seraph
        link
        fedilink
        201 year ago

        What does it matter if they aren’t enforceable?

          • @PyroNeurosis@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            121 year ago

            That may work to a point, people who get off on their noisy shits are more than willing to put in the work themselves.

            • @smackmyballsoff@lemmynsfw.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              Yep, 99% of the time that’s the case around here. Live next to a well trafficked road and have heard enough to identify a modded exhaust. It’s very rare that the loud assholes have stock exhausts, they usually put money into buying loud shit or just slice their old one off for good measure.

              Also, even the modded exhausts wouldn’t be so bad if the drivers didn’t intentionally gun it just to make noise.

              Then come the motorcycle groups, they’re the absolute worst. Even one is bad, but when a group of 50 travel through here on a quiet day it’s just… sad, enraging etc.

              They’re the loudest we get around where I live, if ANYONE is breaking a noise ordinance it’s them, 50× over but I’ve never seen them pulled over or ticketed.

              I don’t care if they’re loud, go do that on a “back road” where the houses are an acre away, don’t do it on a small street where babies are sleeping barely 20 feet away from you. At that volume, being that close they’d might as well knock on your door and scream in your face.

              • @OddFed@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                81 year ago

                BECAUSE THEY ARE STROOOOOONG dude! That’s why loud! I LIIIIKKKEE THE STRONG FAST MACHINE! Strong manly, fast manly, LOUD MANLY!

                • @TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  3
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Amen brother. If your engine doesn’t make every dog in the neighborhood bark can you even call yourself a man? I wanna make every glass of water on the block shake like that scene in Jurassic park.

              • @DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                11 year ago

                That’s not what homie is getting at.

                Irritatingly loud cars don’t come from the manufacturer like that. When you buy a car there’s no “annoyingly loud” option.

                People modify their cars. The objective is better performance, but the car will probably be louder.

                • @OddFed@feddit.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  4
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  In what world? Are you naive? AMG alone is thriving their business model on loud cars. There is luxury brands like Ferrari, Lamborghini, Königsegg which are loud by design. There is muscle cars from Ford, Corvette, Cadillac etc.etc. There is loud Audis, Porsche, BMWs, Mercedes. There es even a ridiculously loud Volkswagen Golf GTI or R.

                  Like what?!?!

                  Edit: they even having a sound check feature on their websites lmao (at least Mercedes)

                  Edit: for reference the Golf R has even a membrane build into to cockpit to amplify its sound to the passengers.

    • @PunnyName@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      131 year ago

      Let’s refocus the police funds of shooting or falsely arresting POC, and instead ticketing and enforcing the loud car situation.

      • @LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        91 year ago

        Who needs cops? I believe CA passed a bill to trial automatic enforcement of this issue last year. Detects excessive noise and photographs the license plates just like speed cameras.

        I’m waiting to see where they will trial it. I haven’t heard anything recently.

              • @LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                61 year ago

                This article says the opposite though.

                Therefore, federal courts have affirmed the right of municipalities to use speeding and red light cameras. Additionally, lawsuits challenging the use of private companies to operate red light cameras have been dismissed or defeated.

                I am not a lawyer and I have wondered about the constitutional questions of these. But according to this the courts have largely allowed them.

    • @egeres@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      I know what I’m saying is not objective data, but where I live I hear a ton of motorcycles that are tweaked to remove the silencers and noise protections

  • @Knightfox
    link
    English
    61
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’ll say that so much of this is unnecessary or even BS. Ban loud cars because they’re annoying, that’s all that is necessary. Set a decibel limit and if you exceed it then you can be fined. Set time limits like when most people are sleeping so you can have loud cars at some more reasonable times and ban them when people aren’t expecting stupidly loud noises.

      • @Knightfox
        link
        English
        61 year ago

        This was the line of thought I had as well, it should be so easy to stop this problem as it stands

        • @Dozzi92@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          51 year ago

          You can’t just bust out a sound meter and take a reading. There are so many factors that it makes it unenforceable, because at the end of the day the burden of proof would still be placed on the enforcement arm that it was that vehicle. How do you control for ambient noise? Distance? Temperature? It is just unenforceable to make a dB level a mark.

          If your car goes pop pop pop, though, I think you need to have your car taken away, and maybe your freedom, because you’re just an asshole.

        • @OddFed@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          You can say this about the whole topic of car centricity. It is easy to solve. It’s just not wanted.

    • @query@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      121 year ago

      Fine the manufacturer for each incident with each vehicle and make them recall and fix every one to stop it. Unless it’s the result of someone modifying their own vehicle, then you seize the vehicle and suspend their license.

    • @Smoogs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Ok well regardless of surrounding habitats; it’s a driving hazard. Loud cars are a hazard on the road if the owner cannot hear those around them. It’s not on the list but it should be front and center when it comes to road safety around others cuz the road is shared.

      • @Knightfox
        link
        English
        61 year ago

        That doesn’t really make a lot of sense either though. Most cars have built in sound proofing and while you can hear other cars, it’s rarely a useful sense when driving. If not being able to hear is a significant hazard then why are deaf people allowed to drive?

          • @TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            31 year ago

            There is for sure, but I would argue that a quieter sports car with too much power for an inexperienced driver to handle is more of a hazard than a loud old beater car. I guess I’m just trying to add that there are other things that people drive that are more dangerous than a loud vehicle that we should probably focus on first, as much as loud vehicles can be a nuisance.

            • @Smoogs@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              Focus on first?

              Why do you need this to be a competition? That’s pretty toxic approach to problems.

              • @TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                1
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                A loud motorcycle is annoying, but way less dangerous than a quiet truck that the driver can’t see over, at least to other drivers and pedestrians. That’s all I was trying to add. No competition or toxicity, so I don’t know why you are getting that vibe. I even gave you that 1 up vote you have on that last comment there.

    • @yA3xAKQMbq@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      61 year ago

      Points 1-9 are empirically proven effects of noise, none of them are BS. Point 10 is an arbitrary opinion.

      • @Knightfox
        link
        English
        31 year ago

        Points 1-9 being empirically proven is still a BS argument unless you’re also supporting banning all loud noises. Using it as a justification for banning loud cars when we are around loud sounds elsewhere.

        • @yA3xAKQMbq@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          51 year ago

          Uh… yes? This is commonly the case.

          Germany e.g. has maximum noise immission levels of 55 dB(A) during daytime in mixed zoning areas to 35 dB(A) at night in hospital and similar areas…

          • @Dozzi92@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            41 year ago

            Ambient sound levels from bugs can exceed 55dBa. We banning bugs?

            35 is literally unobtainable, I don’t understand. Wearing high heels will get you a fine. Laughter. Rain.

            • @yA3xAKQMbq@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              6
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Immission, not emission. Generally the regulations deal with noise made by humans and especially their appliances. Also, of course there are exceptions, e.g. for children.

              And yes, 35 dB(A) is achieveable. A hospital at night is no place to have a party around. Also nobody will wait for you to run around in high heels to give you a fine. But if you regularly do that in your flat and your neighbor below is sick of it, that might get you in trouble.

              Edit: does anyone think downvoting will change those facts? 🤡

              • @Dozzi92@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                21 year ago

                Yeah, immission isn’t a word I’ve ever heard before so excuse my ignorance. Seems to correlate with how things are measured around here, where basically you take a historic ambient sound level and then the adjusted sound level after a source is introduced. For development, obviously doable. For people traversing the local roadway? Literally impossible. In fact, where I am from, the vehicle traffic associated with a use is typically exempt from their land use application because it’s just not feasible to get an accurate representation. It’s also not feasible to have a business put a “No popcorn tunes” sign up, and then actually enforce it.

                Do you have any info on how this 35dB rule is enforced? Genuinely curious. My familiarity with the technology is through the testimony of experts in a quasi-judicial setting, and so I am far from an expert, but what I’ve heard with enough frequency is that it’s difficult if not impossible to pull out vehicle noise from ambient noise.

                In that vein, there are restrictions based on the duration of noises and their level. Basically, a car door slamming is instantaneous. The backup alarm on a truck is constant. But yeah, unrelated. I just don’t know that you can use decibels to limit the motoring public.

                And I say all of this being so staunchly against aftermarket tunes making your exhaust sound like you’re running rich. Shit is stupid. I say this having, at a point in my life, drove a car (factory stock) that had a loud exhaust. And so I think if you’re concerned, the best place to make a change is in regulations associated with vehicle exhausts. Neuter pickups and cars if they can’t cc comply. You need noise to get horsepower and torque? Too bad, muffle and restrict your pipes, and if you can’t make your vehicle strong enough, maybe make it smaller.

                • @yA3xAKQMbq@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  11 year ago

                  Most of all it’s just that there’s written rules, and that you can point at them if you feel things are too loud. With immission a lot is already considered when building new houses, train rails, streets, for example.

                  With cars and motorcycles there’s also emission guidelines, and you have to register aftermarket changes with the inspection authority. And if the police catch you with unregistered alterations they can fine you, ask to show proof of registration within a week, or even impound your vehicle on the spot.

                  And if there’s a e.g. noisy party in your area, you can call the police (a rite of passage for every German – your first noise complaint (“Ruhestörung”)) and they will ask nicely one time, if they have to come a second or third time they might confiscate your stereo, disband the party, etc. But it’s just their decision what’s too loud, they won’t take measurements.

                  If it’s something that’s not immediately obvious (e.g. dogs constantly barking), or the government is… less eager to act (e.g. airports) then it can evolve into a tedious and nerve wrecking legal battle. Which frequently happens.

          • @Knightfox
            link
            English
            21 year ago

            I have lived in 4 different cities, two have no noise limit (just a generic don’t be loud when it will bother others noise ordinance), the other has an 85 db night time ordinance, and the last is 55/45 db residential day/night (60/55 mixed use, 70/60 industrial).

              • @Knightfox
                link
                English
                11 year ago

                Idk, I’m curious how common it is outside of Germany specifically. I’ve heard that Germany has exceptionally strict noise restrictions.

            • @yA3xAKQMbq@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              So you didn’t bother reading the comments right next to yours where I already explained this?

  • @RojoSanIchiban@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    481 year ago

    You guys lump motorcycles in on this, right? There’s some biker rally/meetup relatively close by this week/weekend, so I’m busy giving the finger to every asshole that passes with their stupid straight-pipe harleys and dumb shitty radios screaming skynard or AC/DC.

    I drive an EV, fwiw. There’s literally zero public transportation here, so I’m not on the fuckcars train, sorry.

    • Farid
      link
      fedilink
      English
      591 year ago

      Fuckcars is not necessarily about not having a car. It’s about wanting the conditions in which you’re able to get rid of your car.

    • @BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      221 year ago

      You can have a car and still want to fuck cars… wait no… and still be fuckcars. I do, and I’m mad I need one at all without losing hours a day.

    • @Trashboat@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      81 year ago

      My town has a “bike week” every few months it feels like, where all the people with their way too damn loud bikes get the privilege of blocking off half the city for a week to… I don’t even know?? Drink, I guess? Whatever the case, a major road becomes impassable and the entire city gets too loud to have a conversation on the sidewalk. It’s awful, god knows why the city thinks it’s a good idea. Ugh, now l’m annoyed again just thinking about it…

    • @query@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      8
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I’d argue fossil motorcycles should be banned before fossil cars. If it’s about riding with nothing between you and the ground, an electric MC will do plenty. Otherwise, cars serve the same need.

      • nickwitha_k (he/him)
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        I’m intending to get an electric bike, when I can. For me, nothing beats cruising down fire roads and a bit of single-track on a quiet vehicle.

    • セリャスト
      link
      fedilink
      English
      5
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Driving an EV does not mean you don’t make noise, the noise is also mostly tires on the road above 30 km/h

  • Xusontha
    link
    fedilink
    English
    371 year ago

    But what about that one dude who wants to go rrrrrRRRRRRRRRRRRR at three in the morning and wake up everyone in a five mile radius?

  • @VantaBrandon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    311 year ago

    As someone who lives near a busy road: lets start with making subwoofers illegal first. Its 100x worse than a roaring engine

    • Lord Wiggle
      link
      fedilink
      English
      181 year ago

      How about both? A car with a subwoofer is still a loud car.

    • @HerrBeter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      71 year ago

      Idk about the US but here you can be fined if you cause noise. Like maxing out the subwoofer on a parking lot next to residential areas, being a nuisance. As much as I agree with you, I still found loud exhaust/engine noise worse, just because there’s much more of it.

      • @Vespair@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        51 year ago

        Yeah, there are noise ordinances in theory, but those are never enforced and if you live in a questionable neighborhood, the penalty for calling the cops to enforce them is way steeper than just dealing with the insufferable noise. I hate feeling bass shake my whole house at 2am, but if I have to choose I guess I pick that over being shot.

      • @VantaBrandon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        Yeah there is definitely more of it, but somehow its less disturbing to me. Its at least usually constant whereas bass is like pulsating. The odd Harley Davidson motorcycle can be extremely annoying though, the exhaust on those is designed to be extra loud, which I would say is worse than bass.

        All of the above should be fined, however, its basically unheard of to get in trouble for blasting your speakers or having loud exhaust, at least where I live.

  • Synapse
    link
    fedilink
    English
    171 year ago

    Or just because it’s annoying as hell and we have the technology to make silent cars, so there is no valid reason to have noisy cars on public roads.

    • @Smoogs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      71 year ago

      The reason why someone wants loudness is for their own safety factor such as motorbikes. If cars can’t see them or hear them it is very dangerous. And it helps even less that someone with a car also wants to be loud so they can’t be aware of others on the road.

      • nickwitha_k (he/him)
        link
        fedilink
        English
        251 year ago

        Loud pipes do not actually save lives. It’s been studied. And they absolutely would not have prevented or mitigated my own wreck (sideswiped in traffic), which has led me to an extended hiatus from riding.What did save my life and minimize my injury? Proper safety equipment.

        A full-face helmet that was properly tested for regulatory approval is why I didn’t receive a TBI or need reconstructive surgery, as I high-sided and slid for a ways on my face, and got hit by my bike as it has more inertia.

        An armored jacket with CE level 2 armor is why I suffered a nickel-sized abrasion as my only visible external injury (if it had impact armor covering my abdomen, my internal injuries may have been prevented).

        A pair of armored, kevlar-mesh overalls are why I did not have a broken hip or need extra hardware (my hip does inform me when it’s cold, however).

        A pair of tall, CE certified boots, that were close to needing replacement, are why I sprained, rather than fractured my ankle and why my shin was not fractured. My ankle appears to inform me when precipitation is likely though, so between in and hip, I’m almost a human weather station now :P

        And finally, the piece of equipment that I think did the most to save my life are the CE-Cat 2 EN13594/2015 certified gloves, with hard sliders (steel and composite) that I was wearing. Not only did they prevent significant injury that my hands would have suffered, but they allowed me to gain control of my motion, turning my tumble into a slide and steer myself away from traffic that I would have otherwise collided with, very likely causing fatality.

        Loud pipes really just annoy the piss out of people around the bike and force pedestrians and those in their homes and businesses to pay attention to said biker. There’s better ways to get attention in the community, like volunteer work or developing an impressive skill. Then, take the money that would be going towards loud pipes and spend it on actual, effective safety gear, not that leather vest nonsense.

    • Radioactive Radio
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 year ago

      Silent cars are dangerous too, I had an electric bus zoom past me and i didn’t hear shit because of the busy road. I thought I was dead. They should have some kind of sound at least.

      • Synapse
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        I don’t think it’s the silence that makes car and other vehicle dangerous… It’s the fact that the road is there turf and you as a pedestrian or a cyclist have to be extra vigilant to cross. It’s regrettable most cities are designed that way. Plus, I am almost certain electric buses, just like trams, have a ring bell to make extra noise warning distracted pedestrians. Finally, it’s always the responsibility of the driver (even you as a car driver) to be vigilant of his surrounding, the driver is in charge of the safety of people all around him as he his in control of a massive, deadly machine.

      • @spacesatan@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        So you didnt hear it because other cars are louder. Tire noise already accounts for a substantial amount of the noise that cars make when the exhaust hasnt been modded to be louder.

        • Radioactive Radio
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          Can’t really expect everyone to go full environment friendly mode. And adding silent hunk of fast going metals is just dangerous. Besides living in India you get so used to all the traffic noises, you can’t keep track of tire sounds cuz they’re everywhere.

  • @Smoogs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    141 year ago

    In the right column should also have : cannot be aware of others on the road if you can’t hear their regular engines around you.

    • @foyrkopp@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The only situation here in Europe where I hear individual cars is when I’m a pedestrian on a fairly empty road or when they’re obnoxiously loud.

      Otherwise, I mostly hear my own car due to modern soundproofing and maybe the overall din of all the cars combined.

      The former situation is actually addressed legislatively for really quiet cars (like EVs): They’re required to have a minimum noise level. If they drive slow enough to be really quiet, they have to generate an artificial sound.

      (Edit: I do hear motorcycles, because they tend to have a unique, loud sound.)

    • @pHr34kY@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      I found that a straight-through muffler made for a 99% reduction of pedestrians stepping into the road without looking.

  • @Damaskox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    9
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Eh. Not denying that also cars have cons, but some pros are 1. sometimes the car is the best way/in the shortest time to get somewhere 2. You can carry much more with you if you have a car 3. It can be used as a place to sleep in 4. You can give lifts to people 5. Some work require to have a car (if you need to be in many different places in a day)

    I myself don’t have a driving license and I hope I never need one. I use public transportation and a bicycle to get around.

    Dunno why loudness is a thing though. Reasonable volume should be advised.

  • @thantik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    91 year ago

    No, because there aren’t any businesses which pay a livable wage within walking distance of 98% of Americans. yay logic!

      • mozingo
        link
        fedilink
        English
        5
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        They’re agreeing with y’all tho?

        “Yay logic!” means they think it’s dumb logic.

          • mozingo
            link
            fedilink
            English
            6
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            That’s exactly their point though? The people who argue for cars argue that they’re necessary because US cities aren’t walkable, while conveniently ignoring that that’s entirely due to the auto industry and that making cities more walkable is still an option. They’re pointing out how fucked that logic is.

            If that’s not what they’re saying, then they’re a terrible communicator as well as an idiot.

    • XylightOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      121 year ago

      So let’s make it so that cities are easily traversable without cars!

      • Semi-Hemi-Demigod
        link
        fedilink
        91 year ago

        And in 80 years we might get the report from the committee about the proposal to create a committee to study the feasibility of possibly allowing four story homes.

        Oh, wait, no, some NIMBY killed it.

    • @LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      111 year ago

      True but this really has little to do with the excessive noise issues. Really easy to build quieter cars, we just let assholes choose how loud they want to be and the results are predictable.

  • @Vespair@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    91 year ago

    As somebody who lives in a questionable neighbor, I would personally sacrifice a lot if we could ban vehicles from playing music above personal listening levels while in residential zones. Feeling house-reverberating bass at all hours of the day is way worse than normal car noises.

  • @vreraan@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    81 year ago

    On vehicles modified for sporting purposes the silencers no longer work because the propagation of sound is different and therefore db-killers are applied or it is avoided to drive them around the city center or during off hours. Then there are people who purposely remove the silencer just to make noise and this also reduce factory performance, these deserve to have their license withdrawn because they take advantage of the fact that noisy vehicles occasionally exist.

  • @spacesatan@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    6
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I moved to an apartment adjacent to an intersection on a medium-high traffic stroad and it was the biggest mistake of my life. I have never been so stressed. I can barely even enjoy music now because half the time if I hear low bass in a song I think its coming from outside and I get annoyed for a few seconds.