• Akasazh@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    The inglorious bastards. It treats a very serious subject matter with too much quirky humor.

    Also the Nazi slaughter group is basically like an Einsatz Gruppe, but for slaughtering German soldiers. Literally locking people in a building (often a church) and then setting it ablaze was a technique used against Jews.

    Just reversing the roles doesn’t make it an act that’s worth cheering for, like people did in the cinema when I saw it. I couldn’t detach myself from that, hence why I did personally not enjoy it.

    • darkl1nk@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Inglorious Bastards ain’t your average war flick or history lesson, it’s Tarantino doing his offbeat thing. The humor’s not mocking the war, but poking at the villains. The Basterds are soldiers, not a hit squad against innocents. The cinema cheers? That’s just folks enjoying seeing the Nazis get some comeuppance. If you didn’t dig it, cool. But remember, Tarantino’s all about pushing buttons and sparking chatter. If it got under your skin, maybe it hit the mark.

      • Akasazh@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Inglorious Bastards ain’t your average war flick or history lesson, it’s Tarantino doing his offbeat thing

        I can understand that, I like his style ususally. But that’s point of my disappointment. As a historian I cannot see it apart from the historical events. But the crowd reaction is what really freaked me out, it’s scary if you think of it.

        But remember, Tarantino’s all about pushing buttons and sparking chatter. If it got under your skin, maybe it hit the mark.

        It may have. I think the true brilliance of the movie is how the audience, due to framing, can be induced to condone the killing of innocents. I sincerely hope that wasn’t actually Tarantino’s intention.

        For instance the soldier killed by the bear jew refused to give up military secrets under threat of death. He chooses te respectfully refuse and is then killed. Framed differently in lots of war movies this is a heroic act.

        But here people then cheer when te bear jew comes out and finishes him off.

        All of this is an actual war crime.

        That’s just folks enjoying seeing the Nazis get some comeuppance.

        Indeed and I know, it’s all a bit of good fun. I just can separate it from the very real and very deadly seriousness of this part of history. That was what the main question of this thread was about.

        • bane_killgrind@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          This is such a weird take when… Why is it scary when the Nazis are obviously the bad guys? This movie is revenge porn against the most indulgent actors in one of the worst parts of European history. Chris waltz is never portraying his character as sympathetic in any way.

          What innocents are being hurt in this movie? The movie goers that are participating it the propaganda screening?

      • Akasazh@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Listen. It is one of the hardest cases to discern guilt in wartime situations. Membership of the nazi parti or being a german soldier is not per se a sign of guilt. Just like just being a jew is no reason to be killed, too. I’m all for sentencing war criminals, but the soldier killed by bear jew nor the people sitting in the cinema (aside from Hitlers direct circle) have been proven to be guilty of war crimes.

        If you applaud them burning, you’re basicly using the same system of dehumanising a group of people as the nazi party and the SS used for making people belief sloughtering jews, gypsies, gay people is ok. That is very, very wrong.

  • BetweentheBars@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Faces of Death (1978)

    The first viewing was full of shock value.

    After that it was not my cup of tea. Repulsive on many levels.

    Now that subject matter is just a normal Tuesday on Reddit.

  • neomachino@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    I may get a lot of hate for this, and I wouldn’t say it was a huge disappointment because I actually really liked most of the movies but, Star Wars.

    I thought they were great moviees, but when watching them after years of everyone telling me to and all the hype I was kind of disappointed even though I enjoyed watching them all. For me they just didn’t live up to the hype I guess.

  • thegreatloofa@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    I tried twice to watch The Godfather and fell asleep both times. Nothing about it caught me at all.

  • ThisIsNecessary@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m afraid to watch the Princess Bride because everyone I know loves it and begs me to watch it and I’m afraid it will be terrible and when they ask me how it was I’ll have to lie

    • NakedGardenGnome@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Speaking as someone who also loves the movie: I won’t hate you of it’s not your jam, but give it a try nonetheless! Worst case you just lost some time, but you at least gave it a shot.

  • WatTyler@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I had a little personal crisis when I watched The Big Lebowski for the first time and just hated it. I was so bored.

    I’ll have to give it another go and hope I get it .

  • Acid@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    The first Mad Max movie, just feels like a slog at times to get through and when you finally finish it there’s no resolution it’s just a cliffhanger into the next movie.

  • sideone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    No country for old men. I get that it’s supposed to be bleak and not resolve at the end. I still hate that it’s bleak and doesn’t resolve at the end. I didn’t really get the “amazingness” of the coin flip scene either.

    I also thought Blade Runner was ok, but the whole “tears in the rain” monologue is so hyped on the internet that it was a bit meh when it actually happened.

    • Nusm@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      No country for old men. I get that it’s supposed to be bleak and not resolve at the end. I still hate that it’s bleak and doesn’t resolve at the end.

      Yes! I was expecting more, and was left feeling cheated at the end with no resolution. It felt like wasted time.

  • OctopusKurwa @lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I can’t stand the Fifth Element. On paper, it should be perfect for me but I just find it really obnoxious.

    • AttackBunny@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I wholeheartedly disagree but can understand why. I love it, but I feel like if I watched it now, I wouldn’t, or at least not nearly as much as I remember. It’s pretty over the top, but Chris tucker as ruby rhod is one of my favorite parts. I think it was also the time it came out. There wasn’t a whole lot like it, that I can remember.

      • darkl1nk@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Don’t overthink about rewatching it. The movie’s unique style still stands out today. Ruby Rhod? Still a standout character. The timeless themes? Still hit home. And its unique spot in the sci-fi genre? Still uncontested. This isn’t just some '90s relic, it’s a movie that’s stood the test of time. Give it another go, you might find it’s held up better than you think.

    • dotmatrix@lemmy.ftp.rip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      lmao, I just recently realised I’ve seen that movie so many times and have no idea what it’s about.

  • jacaw@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Synecdoche New York. Every one of my friends who’ve seen it think it’s brilliant. I tried watching it and felt like I was losing my mind. I know that’s the point, but that doesn’t make it a good movie!

    • itscherriedbro@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I fucking love that movie. It’s like my number 1 of all time. But I’m glad other people don’t like it because that gives me hope for humanity lol

  • Ben@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Almost all of them when I had read the book first.

    The Hobbit

    The latest (The Hobbit) I got my son to read the book, then watch the movies and he’s like ‘Whaaaaaa???’ because they tried to amplify it into a blockbuster.

    So yes, Great movie - but sucked after reading the book.

    • nik282000@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The latest The Hobbit(s) were terrible, the old animated film was actually not bad.

    • Llamajockey@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I had friends who actually preferred the Hobbit to LOTR because of more action (according to them) But then I slowly told them all the shit that they just added for no reason and now they hate me