The trial over an effort in Minnesota to keep former President Donald Trump off of the 2024 ballot began Thursday at the state Supreme Court as a similar case continued in Colorado.

The lawsuits in both states allege Trump should be barred from the 2024 ballot for his conduct leading up to the Jan. 6, 2021, riot at the U.S. Capitol. They argue Trump’s efforts to overturn the 2020 election results violated Section 3 of the 14th Amendment to the Constitution, which says no one who has “engaged in insurrection or rebellion” after swearing an oath to support and defend the Constitution can hold office.

A group of Minnesota voters, represented by the election reform group Free Speech for People, sued in September to remove Trump from the state ballot under the 14th Amendment provision. The petitioners include former Minnesota Secretary of State Joan Growe and former state Supreme Court Justice Paul H. Anderson.

  • qooqie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    Okay say they’re successful I have a question about write ins, will they count that towards his total? Or is he completely removed from running and being voted for in that state?

    • NeverNudeNo13@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      In general this would depend on the state… In Minnesota the canvass following the general ballot is used to determine who the states electors are going to be. These individuals represent their districts and are then legally obligated to only vote for candidates that meet eligibility and are on the ballot. So there would need to be a certain threshold of write ins met before he could actually make it to the electors ballots and he would have to submit a proper write in registration form ahead of time… Because those electors are casting votes in representation for their districts they would not be authorized to write in a candidate of their own choosing as they would basically be going completely against their electoral districts clearly defined intentions.

      So it’s possible he could even win a fair share of the popular vote but be unable to be even selected as a candidate by the electors as they are legally unable to vote for him unless he is a properly displayed candidate on their ballots.

      Super unlikely, but it would depend on how the state’s Supreme Court would decide to uphold its write in registration process following the decision… And also it would probably be petitioned to higher courts who would likely overturn it since it’s extremely dangerous precedent.

    • Dkarma@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Doesn’t the language say they aren’t eligible to hold office? Even if they were written in they couldn’t technically accept, legally and election officialls would be banned from counting the person’s votes.

      With maga corrupt officials in some states tho who knows.