• TrickDacy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    111
    ·
    1 year ago

    Fuck apple. I love that the EU is constantly forcing them to be less shitty. And apple no doubt is super pissed. Being shitty is their business model

      • gregorum@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        44
        ·
        1 year ago

        They didn’t throttle anything. The chip in the iPhone 15 simply isn’t capable of the full speed. 

        • lud@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          While true, it’s interesting that the SOC in the “pro” models have started adopting a “pro” branding for the first time.

          So it’s quite likely that they will give the equivalent processor minus the “pro” features to the base model next year. I am betting that USB 3.x is a “pro” feature.

          • GamingChairModel@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            No, they tend to use last year’s Pro chip in this year’s base model. The A16 only supported USB 2.0 speeds last year in the iPhone 14 Pro model (despite the iPads showing us that Lightning does support USB 3 speeds), and it’s what’s in this year’s iPhone 15 base model.

            The A17 supports higher speed through the USB Bus, so there’s no reason to hold that back for next year’s base model.

            • lud@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yes, I am aware.

              The thing that’s notable this time is that the pro chips are branded with “pro”. This absolutely means that next year the base models will get the same chip except it’s stripped of some features and its “pro” branding. The question is which features. I am betting it’s USB 3.0.

          • gregorum@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Pros are usually the ones who need to transfer massive ProRes video files at high speed. The vast majority of regular users don’t.

            • lud@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              17
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Not an excuse when pretty much every other phone has it and has had it for many years.

              And the “pro” branding is just branding bullshit anyways. It doesn’t mean anything.

                • lud@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Yes, pretty much every new-ish phone (and old-ish when talking flagship phones)

                  Of course the very cheap budget options don’t.

              • gregorum@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                It’s not an excuse, it’s just a reason. If the phone doesn’t have the features you want and you buy it anyway, that’s hardly Apple’s fault.

                • lud@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  10
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  It’s stupid and it’s apple’s fault for being behind their competitors.

                  It’s not illegal, just fucking stupid.

                  I won’t buy an iPhone anyway because of their software.

            • GamingChairModel@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              But that’s exactly why last year’s 14 Pro came under so much criticism for its slow wired connection: the phone itself supported capturing high resolution, high framerate, high bitrate ProRes video, but didn’t have a way of quickly transferring directly over a cable.

              But also, even regular photos and video can take up a big chunk of space, and having a non-cloud option for practically backing up the contents is helpful.

          • abhibeckert@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            So it’s quite likely that they will give the equivalent processor minus the “pro” features to the base model next year

            Actually… that’s unlikely.

            This year’s “Pro” processor is fabricated on TSMC’s 3nm N3B process that has very low yield rates - Apple is apparently taking up 90% of the global production capacity for N3B fabrication even though they only use it with relatively low volume “Pro” chipsets.

            They’ll surely have better yields next year, but it would still be nowhere near enough to put them in the mainstream iPhone models. TSMC has said they have a new process (which will require new chip designs) online now, and that’s what next year’s mainstream iPhones will use. Manufacturing might have already started (for a late next year launch date).

        • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          “hey they didn’t add a governor to the car, it’s just a shitty motor that they happened to decide not to upgrade”

          • gregorum@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            1 year ago

            The chip in the iPhone 15 is an upgrade from the iPhone 14. It just doesn’t do what you specifically want it to do. Perhaps you should buy a different phone.

      • SuperFola@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 year ago

        Do you really use USB-C to transfer data or to charge your phone? It’s been years since I used it for data, so I don’t think that’s a problem, in a world where cloud is becoming the norm.

    • Nogami@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      You’re sort of a one trick pony aren’t you? All full of Apple hate. Must be a bitter life you lead.

  • thorbot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    1 year ago

    From a coding perspective, they are all quite distinct. However, I don’t doubt they were using that argument just to weasel out of getting regulated

    • EliasChao
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I would argue that iPadOS Safari and iOS Safari are not really that different though.

        • EliasChao
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s what I mean, would you say iPadOS Safari and iOS Safari don’t share a good chunk of their codebase?

          • bamboo@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            The vast majority of the code is WebKit, which is the same across platforms. The UI is a small amount of code compared to WebKit, and even then I’m sure there is a lot of sharing between the iOS and iPadOS versions.

  • Rusticus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is an apple_enthusiast community. Why are there so many Apple hating trolls on here? Is their life really so harmed by the existence of Apple that they have to spend every waking moment trashing them on an enthusiast community? I feel sorry for them.

    • kewwwi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      because it’s on the front page probably.

      besides, it’s not like apple users are staying out of android-‘enthusiast’ communities or behaving any better.

        • halferect@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          This just showed up I’m my feed, I could care less what you use and I’m a android user who never been in a android community. I don’t like corporations playing games to skirt laws though

    • EliasChao
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I have many Apple devices across pretty much all of their categories, that doesn’t stop me from being very vocal when in disagree with them.

      Being an Apple user, heck an Apple fan, doesn’t mean that you have to applaud every single thing the company does and never disagree.