ZeroCool@feddit.ch to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2年前Max users grandfathered into $15.99 ad-free plan lose 4K, HDR next montharstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square37fedilinkarrow-up1210file-textcross-posted to: technology@lemmit.onlinemoviesandtv@lemm.eetechnology@lemmy.world
arrow-up1210external-linkMax users grandfathered into $15.99 ad-free plan lose 4K, HDR next montharstechnica.comZeroCool@feddit.ch to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2年前message-square37fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: technology@lemmit.onlinemoviesandtv@lemm.eetechnology@lemmy.world
minus-squareGoronmon@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up5·2年前 Why should quality be a tier? Because it costs more to stream 4k content than lower quality content? Not agreeing with it, but the justification is easy to make.
minus-squarethesprongler@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·2年前It costs inconsequentially more to host large files, sure, but the cost is usually on the consumer vis-à-vis their ISP to stream larger files.
minus-squareGoronmon@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2年前 It costs inconsequentially more to host large files, sure, but the cost is usually on the consumer vis-à-vis their ISP to stream larger files. You are wording this like you are disagreeing, while still agreeing with what I said.
Because it costs more to stream 4k content than lower quality content?
Not agreeing with it, but the justification is easy to make.
It costs inconsequentially more to host large files, sure, but the cost is usually on the consumer vis-à-vis their ISP to stream larger files.
You are wording this like you are disagreeing, while still agreeing with what I said.