• Nobody@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    ·
    1 year ago

    the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion

    That’s language from the Treaty of Tripoli that was signed by John Adams, our second president. The Founding Fathers were grounded in Enlightenment philosophy. Whatever their personal faith was, they recognized that faith should not dominate politics. That is a threat to democracy and honest compromise in policy.

  • mnoram@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    63
    ·
    1 year ago

    How did it not go well? The article just details how people are defending his record and beliefs but shows no repercussions nor is it “not going well” for his defenders. He is second in line for the presidency with insane beliefs and theocratic tendencies. Sure seems to be going just fine for him, unfortunately for us.

    • Telorand@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 year ago

      Maybe it’s “not going well,” because the majority of the public aren’t buying their shit? Seems to kind of ring hollow when they have the power to both bring bills to the floor and vote on them.

      • eric@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you have to guess what the title means after reading the article, it’s a pretty bad title.

        • Telorand@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Oh, I wasn’t talking about the article. It’s an opinion piece, so I feel justified sharing mine.

  • Motavader@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    1 year ago

    “It’s a central premise of the Bible that God invented civil government,” Johnson told Olohan, who added that, “like many Americans of faith, Johnson sees government as a ‘design of God’ and ‘a gift to mankind in a fallen society.’

    These people are literally insane.

  • hogunner@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    1 year ago

    It would still be concerning if these nut jobs actually followed all the Bible’s “teachings” like they espouse to but instead they believe that they get to decide what parts of the Bible should be taken literally, what parts need “modern” interpretation and what parts are ignored or hidden.

    This makes them even more dangerous because it gives them the power to decide who is abiding by their god’s law and who is in violation of it.

      • hogunner@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        1 year ago

        Agreed but I think we can all agree that while cults are troubling and shouldn’t exist, death cults are even more so. The type of “Christianity” he subscribes to is very much a death cult.

    • spaceghotiOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      In fairness, they have to. There’s a fun challenge out there that says open the Bible to a random page and do whatever it says. The last person to go to jail wins.

      The Bible doesn’t teach morality. It reveals the morality the believer has chosen.

  • inspired@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    1 year ago

    This man looks like he’s always about to kiss you full on the mouth but you know what he really wants to do is make a jacket out of your skin. 0 stars.

  • BabyWah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 year ago

    Off topic, but there’s something really really wrong with this guy. I don’t like the continuous half smirk on his face. I don’t like absolutely anything about him and find him creepy.

    • Minarble@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s the uncanny valley reflex.

      At some period in Homo Sapiens evolution we developed an instinct for … things that weren’t quite right. They looked like people they talked like people. They were not people. They were dangerous, they were non human. We faced evolutionary pressure to recognise them. That means if you could not recognise these … things you would be removed from the gene pool.

      That is why you find him creepy.

      • remotelove@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I am trying to think of an example of something dangerous that talks like a human, almost looks like a human, but isn’t human… A politician?