In the past six years, 19 states have made efforts to move to year-round daylight saving time. So what’s in the way?

  • ExFed@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    The opposite. For northern latitudes, the time switch is actually somewhat beneficial. People generally don’t love waking up and going to work/school/whatever in the pitch black. DST doesn’t magically “save daylight.” The total amount is daylight is the same for either.

    The only real solution is permanent Standard Time. Local businesses and governments already shift their business hours as they see fit for other reasons, so keeping “summer hours” and “winter hours” is totally reasonable.

    • Wahots@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t mind dark mornings, since I’m already at work by 7am each day. But not being able to walk/bike in a park safely each afternoon, not being able to cook outside, or hang out with friends in the daylight is a bit sad. And also SAD as in the disorder since we are now inside during the only hours of daylight…

      • mkhopper@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        This right here is the reason I call for permanent DST.
        I’m at latitude 42N and having less daylight time in the evenings during the warm months would be awful.

    • derf82@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      While we might not love going to work in pitch black, we don’t care to have all our evening in it, either. As you say, the total amount of daylight is the same, so we have to pick our poison. I’d rather have more light in the evening. I will hate the 5pm darkness that comes tomorrow.

      Morning our schedules is no better than moving out clocks.

      • ExFed@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        We’re kind of having the same argument in two different threads … I’m not sure which thread is better.

        Morning our schedules is no better than moving out clocks.

        It’s objectively better! “Moving clocks” is effectively the same as moving schedules for individuals, but to practically coordinate with others, everybody must change their clock and therefore their schedule. Individuals and organizations already construct their schedules as needed.

        Part of the issue is that we all work too damn much, anyways. The 40 hour, 5 day work week (and thus the 9-to-5) is an arbitrary concept that research has indicated may be just as effective as a shorter work week.

        • derf82@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          We have to have schedules. We have to have some consistency of time. I change my schedule, I will be out of sync with everyone else.

          Yeah, we should work less, but we don’t have much of a choice. I think we are more apt to get year round DST than a shorter week.