• unfreeradical@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The line is imaginary, and division by any line is not particularly natural or useful.

    What consensus are you imagining? I cannot recall being asked to offer an opinion for any consensus.

    Who participated in constructing the consensus? What processes are generally available to challenge the entrenched consensus, or to direct the development of a new consensus?

    Which groups have supported such a consensus more strongly than others?

    • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Bullshit lines don’t matter. You clearly act like it does. Do you eat anything randomly or do you have standards of hygiene and taste and nutrition?

      Yeah you weren’t consulted. Your whims don’t outrule billions of people who refuse to be ordered to believe that 2 + 2 = 5.

      Still goalposting moving, which is also unskilled labor.

      • unfreeradical@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You asserted a consensus had been formed.

        Who participated in forming the consensus?

        Did you participate? Are you benefiting from such a consensus? Would you be harmed by its being replaced?

        Why is your tone so protective and forceful?

        • psud@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Look at the votes on this comment tree. Clearly there is a consensus, clearly Amazon packers are on the “unskilled” side of the line