Any websites you like or Youtube reviewers? I prefer reviewers who also check out obscure games and actually point out flaws.

Console gaming mostly since PC has Steam reviews that help out.

I’ve always used Metacritic since it aggregates reviews, but it seems to have gotten worse for searching and finding top lists lately. There’s gotta be better sources nowadays.

  • kratoz29@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    Huh, I think I haven’t thought about this hard enough, as I’m a Patient Gamer… But I think Reddit and Lemmy are good sources for this :)

  • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    I like patient gamer communities, since I can get a fan consensus, a lot of hype or hate has died down, and there’s been some time to work out the kinks and send out updates.

  • corytheboyd@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ll be honest, I just look at the steam store page for the game. If the initial impression from the images is good, and it’s a genre I want to play right now, I watch one or two of the videos and read a few top reviews. Then I just go for it. I don’t watch streams or anything. I am usually perusing indie games so it’s at most like $20 on the line, not the end of the world if I hate it, or if it needs a few years of patches to feel worth playing.

    • Odelay42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Generally not being interested in $60 AAA games makes it so much more fun to peruse new games and experiment.

  • fritata_fritato@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    My gaming backlog hasn’t quite made it out of the 2000s. At this point there are years of consensus on most of these games and I prioritise on vibe

    • wia@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      ACG is my go to. I don’t think he’s ever steered me wrong.

      Obviously watch some reviews he’s done of games you’ve played to see if your tastes align.

  • Boiglenoight@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    The Jeff Gerstmann Show, Nextlander, Opencritic. Trusted sources are Game Informer, Gamespot, Eurogamer and IGN.

  • bridge_too_close@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’d say find a youtuber or streamer who has similar tastes to you and follow them. Personally, I follow SkillUp and ACG.

    You can also check out OpenCritic for a review aggregator.

  • ThisOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Zero Punctuation for me. He has a similar taste in games to what I like and a so so positive ZP review is usually a solid buy for me.

    I guess the name is changing soon to fully ramblematic? There’s drama with the owner of the ZP IP right now and the folks who actually own the IP are 100% gonna fuck it up. Creator is starting fresh after a walking from a bad deal is how I understand the situation.

  • Alimentar@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Worth A Buy on YouTube is very honest. He’s funny and cynical, a bit like Total Biscuit used to be.

    He’s one of the few I trust now for an honest review. Would highly recommend him as he’s also incredibly entertaining.

    • jettrscga@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Oh yeah Worth A Buy has popped up for me a few times for indie games, and he seemed like he was straight to the point.

      I got a Total Biscuit vibe too. I miss that guy.

  • Ashtear@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t think I’ve ever really liked the way Metacritic does it. GameRankings was my go-to for years (RIP), but I’ve preferred OpenCritic for review aggregating since they started up.

    There’s a lot of churn in video games criticism right now, and this year in particular highlighted some issues I have with how some outlets are doing things with their reviews. Things like rushing to press without finishing games (even just 20 hours in some cases), and omitted technical performance/bug discussion. I was enjoying The Washington Post’s game section but that got shut down. Eurogamer and Gamespot were previous favorites of mine, but they seem to have changed their criticism style and I’m not a fan of what either are doing.

    I do have some PC outlets I still like (PC Gamer and Rock, Paper, Shotgun for anyone else reading), but I can’t say I have an outstanding favorite otherwise at the moment. I pretty much just browse OpenCritic and pick out reviews at the extreme ends of the score spread and some random ones in the middle at this point.

    I try to do the patient gamer thing too, as I’m always happier with games that have been polished (and they are cheaper). The threads in those communities are great for finding games. The Fediverse has one at !patientgamers@sh.itjust.works although it’s still not super active yet.

  • LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I always look for let’s play series by 2-3 different YouTubers (1-2 episodes) before I decide if the game is for me. Scores are meaningless if I am not interested in that genre or specific gameplay mechanics