blahsay@lemmy.world to Comic Strips@lemmy.world · 3 年前Double blind win (by skeletonclaw)lemmy.worldimagemessage-square41fedilinkarrow-up11.21K
arrow-up11.21KimageDouble blind win (by skeletonclaw)lemmy.worldblahsay@lemmy.world to Comic Strips@lemmy.world · 3 年前message-square41fedilink
minus-squareBedSharkPal@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up16·3 年前Single blind studies do exist though… For some reason.
minus-squarebjorney@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up15·3 年前If the experimenter never really interacts with the participants and there is no subjective measurement being made there isn’t really any benefit to being double blind, it’s just overhead at that point
minus-squareAnony Moose@lemmy.cacakelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·3 年前Well then, how will they gloat and laugh in the participant’s face like in the comic?
minus-squarehansl@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·3 年前And they’re two scientists so it’s really double single blinded win!
minus-squareChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.delinkfedilinkarrow-up1·3 年前Yes, I think some treatments cannot be done without the scientist knowing.
Single blind studies do exist though… For some reason.
If the experimenter never really interacts with the participants and there is no subjective measurement being made there isn’t really any benefit to being double blind, it’s just overhead at that point
Well then, how will they gloat and laugh in the participant’s face like in the comic?
And they’re two scientists so it’s really double single blinded win!
Yes, I think some treatments cannot be done without the scientist knowing.