db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 3 年前OpenSubtitles.org is shutting down it's previous API. Now only authenticated access allowed.blog.opensubtitles.comexternal-linkmessage-square207fedilinkarrow-up1781cross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanshackernews@derp.foo
arrow-up1781external-linkOpenSubtitles.org is shutting down it's previous API. Now only authenticated access allowed.blog.opensubtitles.comdb0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 3 年前message-square207fedilinkcross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanshackernews@derp.foo
minus-squareSpaceNoodle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13·edit-23 年前You’ve never heard of broadcast radio or TV?
minus-squarelud@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·edit-23 年前Lots of ads Edit: also tv news is also a new concept.
minus-squareSpaceNoodle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·3 年前Right, so ads aren’t a recent development.
minus-squarelud@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 年前Ads have existed for an extremely long time. And most news has cost money since forever. Tv news is a relatively new development and TV news is entirely founded by ads and as a way to drive viewers to a channel to keep them for other programmes.
minus-squareSpaceNoodle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·3 年前TV news is 80 years old. It’s far from new.
minus-squareSpaceNoodle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·3 年前Not sure why you keep stating it.
minus-squareSpaceNoodle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·3 年前Because you keep insisting on repeating falsehoods.
minus-squareSpaceNoodle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·3 年前How is something 80 years old “new?”
minus-squarelud@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 年前Relatively new compared to news. Either way it doesn’t matter, my point was that it’s funded by ads. Tv news also drives viewers to a channel which is probably the main purpose of it.
You’ve never heard of broadcast radio or TV?
Lots of ads
Edit: also tv news is also a new concept.
Right, so ads aren’t a recent development.
Ads have existed for an extremely long time.
And most news has cost money since forever.
Tv news is a relatively new development and TV news is entirely founded by ads and as a way to drive viewers to a channel to keep them for other programmes.
TV news is 80 years old. It’s far from new.
Again, that was not my point.
Not sure why you keep stating it.
Why are you so stuck on the tv thing?
Because you keep insisting on repeating falsehoods.
How is something 80 years old “new?”
Relatively new compared to news. Either way it doesn’t matter, my point was that it’s funded by ads.
Tv news also drives viewers to a channel which is probably the main purpose of it.