Recent polling suggests that Americans are very worried about gun violence. A Quinnipiac University poll taken from Oct. 26 to 30, right after the Maine shooting, found that 46 percent of registered voters worried about becoming a victim of a mass shooting themselves. That matches a high set in July 2022 in the wake of the Uvalde, Texas, shooting at Robb Elementary School, and is 9 points higher than a low of 37 percent in December 2017, the year the survey began asking the question.
Americans also feel pessimistic that anything will change. Indeed, 68 percent don’t believe the federal government will do anything to reduce gun violence within the next year, per the Quinnipiac poll.
I have a BiL that said he would rather a crazy person be allowed to have a gun than ensure his 4yo can be safe in school or in public. You sound like him.
ETA: Libertarianism is when you can’t be bothered to think of the consequences or follow the evidence.
I mean… the evidence is there. The Holocaust. Maoist China. Stalin’s Soviet Union. British tyranny over the 13 American colonies.
There is a reason the Second Amendment exists. It provides a physical wedge between the rights of the people and the government, which always seeks to restrict those rights. The consequence of disarmament? See the list in my previous paragraph.
And I’m sure that when the armies of the largest empires in the world show up to invade America, we’ll all be safe due to your unlimited heroism.
Not if you have anything to do about it, surely.
Those atrocities occurred after the groups to be victimized were disarmed: Jews, Russian people, Chinese people. The American War of Independence was started when the British army attempted to confiscate weapons.
There really is no legitimate reason for a government to disarm its citizens.
So the people getting shot on the regular are what, sacrifices to patriotism? Soldiers dying in defense of the American way? The tens of thousands of deaths by suicide each year are the price we pay for freedom?
And are you seriously okay with that?
I don’t see firearms as the cause of those deaths. No data shows more than a correlation between firearms and firearm-related deaths. I believe there are other issues that are causative.
Additionally, I don’t see firearm-related deaths as worse than deaths in other categories. Are we more concerned with firearm-related deaths than with deaths with known causes, such as unaffordable healthcare, heart disease, or unsafe driving? Firearm-related deaths accounted for 1.5% of all deaths in the United States in 2022. Rifles, including AR-15-patterned rifles and other types, accounted for 0.02% of deaths that year, while handguns accounted for 0.25%. Meanwhile, 21.88% of deaths were caused by heart disease, 19.53% were caused by cancer, and 5.47% were caused by strokes (these percentages are approximate).
Instead of addressing the 1/50th of one percent of deaths by illegally infringing upon an enumerated right, we should address real causes of mortality by increasing access to affordable healthcare, solving the affordability crisis, and improving access to mental healthcare. Those truly concerned for the safety of children in schools should do away with “gun-free zones” (I call them “Shoot here without fear” zones) and insist upon modern physical security standards and better funding for schools. We have awful schools! Millions of taxpayer dollars are wasted attempting to legally defend indefensible Second Amendment infringements that could otherwise be spent improving our schools and the education of our children.
If you really think that guns are a problem and you really want to address the problem, why the AR-15 “assault weapon” fetish? Why do you gun grabbers focus on everything except for facts?
Data sources in this comment:
I would buy that if gun lovers voted like they cared about schools, health care, and affordability. But you don’t. You pay lip service and post screeds on the Internet and vote with people who will make things objectively worse on all those fronts.
Nothing has changed since Columbine, and nothing will, because you don’t act like you honestly care people are dying.
How do you know what gun owners vote for? You’re making an ignorant assumption about what gun owners vote for. Gun owners exist in every single demographic. There are Black gun owners, Indigenous gun owners, Jewish gun owners, Latinx gun owners, LGBT gun owners.
We own guns because we desire the ability to protect ourselves and we understand the history of gun control in this country: To disarm and victimize undesired groups, in particular, Blacks.
I see the push for gun control to be hand-in-hand with the movement to criminalize self-defense. This is reprehensible.
Gee, why would I think that?
This conversation was old after Sandy Hook. You’ve already answered my question: You don’t honestly care that Americans aren’t safe anywhere because of guns because that’s the price of freedom. Thanks for at least being honest.
Your dishonesty is tiring and pathetic. Don’t presume to read my mind, and don’t put words into my mouth.
The second amendment doesn’t exist to fight the government. It exists to have militias to protect the US in the event of an invasion (which is about as likely in the modern era as North Korea becoming a democracy).
Local militias would not have been able to stop any of the things you listed, and it still does absolutely nothing to solve children dying from guns, now the leading cause of child death.
Restudy the history of the Second Amendment. You’ll find that it was insisted upon because the signatories were uncomfortable with the potential for tyranny by the federal government.
Irrelevant to my point. The people who signed on to the Second Amendment did not have to deal with mass shootings at the rate we experience today or guns becoming the leading cause of death in children. Meanwhile, when has “protecting yourself from a tyrannical government” ever come to pass? (Don’t say the Civil War, which was about owning slaves, not tyrrany).
I’m for gun ownership, with common-sense regulations. What mechanism do you propose that is better than regulation and restriction that would better prevent this senseless loss of life?
That’s precisely why tyrannical governments disarm their citizens first. If people willingly give up their arms, they are more easily subjugated.
Gun control advocates have proven that they are unable to write common-sense regulations. If they hadn’t broken trust with all the talk of “assault weapons” and inaccurate or false descriptions of firearms to exaggerate how dangerous they are, there would be more “common-sense” regulations in place today.
Use modern physical security practices at schools. If the government is going to make it illegal to carry weapons there, then it has a greater responsibility to protect the defenseless children who are forced to be there. And don’t give me that “oh, that shouldn’t be necessary” crap. If you’re going to force kids to attend school, you have a responsibility to protect them. Period.
Improve access to healthcare of all sorts and fix the affordability crisis.
Get rid of Fifth-Amendment-violating red flag laws. If it doesn’t have due process, it’s illegal and tyrannical and shouldn’t be a law. If you want to disarm someone, you should have to prove that their rights need to be taken away first. Additionally, damage to one’s confiscated property should be reimbursed. Confiscating someone’s arms after proper due process does not infringe upon the Second Amendment.