Seriously this was very surprising. I’ve been experimenting with GrayJay since it was announced and I largely think it’s a pretty sweet app. I know there are concerns over how it isn’t “true open source” but it’s a hell of a lot more open than ReVanced. Plus, I like the general design and philosophy of the app.

I updated the YouTube backend recently and to my surprise and delight they had added support for SponsorBlock. However, when I went to enable it, it warned me “turning this on harms creators” and made me click a box before I could continue.

Bruh, you’re literally an ad-blocking YouTube frontend. What kind of mental gymnastics does it take to be facilitating ad-blocking and then at the same time shame the end-user for using an extension which simply automates seeking ahead in videos. Are you seriously gonna tell me that even without Sponsorblock, if I skip ahead past the sponsored ad read in a video, that I’m “harming the creator”?

  • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    1 year ago

    I mean, the person making the video you are watching respected your time to the point they put in 10-100x the amount of time it takes you to watch that video to make it.

    And the sponsor ad is how they afford said time commitment.

    • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      they put in 10-100x the amount of time it takes you to watch that video to make it.

      And show it to millions of people… So per capita… I put in more time then they did.

      • kernelle@0d.gs
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Hence why it might be hurtful to small creators. I’d love to see the numbers on that though, as the overall percentage of people using an adblocker is very low, I assume for Sponsorblock it’s significantly less.