What would be some fact that, while true, could be told in a context or way that is misinfomating or make the other person draw incorrect conclusions?

  • Retro@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    109
    ·
    1 year ago

    Light roasted coffee has more caffeine than dark roasted coffee.

    Technically, per bean, more of the caffeine is cooked out of the dark roast. However, other things are also roasted out of a dark roast to the point that the individual beans are also lighter and smaller. When brewing coffee, usually you either weigh your dose of beans out, or you use a scoop for some consistency. Either method will result in more dark roast beans ultimately making it into the brew than would with a (larger, heavier) light roast.

    Typically, this more than cancels out the reduced caffeine content per bean, so a brew of dark roast coffee still typically has more caffeine in it.

    • Acetamide@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      1 year ago

      If I remember correctly, dark roast was also originally devised to hide bad-quality coffee beans. Nowadays it is often implied that darker roasts are better, which actually isn’t necessarily the case.

      • Fenzik@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        Implied where? All the coffee snobs ik ow drink lighter roasts and derogatorily call dark roasts “supermarket coffee”

      • Jay K@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Dark roasts have a more consistent taste/flavor and it has a longer shelf life, so it’s easier to know what you’re getting. If you want to taste the variety of flavors coffee can have, you’ll go for fresher lighter roasts.

    • danielton@outpost.zeuslink.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yup, I had to explain this to so many people when I sold coffee. Nobody believed me at all. I explained that dark roast had more of the caffeine cooked out of it.

    • dan@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      Oh shit I’ve repeated this to people and confidently claimed I can “feel” the difference with light roasts. Brains are stupid.

        • sajran@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Eh, sorry about that. wefwef told me to retry because there was an error while posting my comment. So I did retry… many times. I was actually sure the comment wasn’t posted at all until I saw your reply.

    • CeruleanRuin
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Thank you for laying it out like this. I’d often heard that about light roasts, but had never noticed any difference in my caffeine response when I switch roasts. At any rate I’ve always preferred dark for the flavor, but it’s good to know I’m not sacrificing any buzz for it!

    • rumckle@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I remember looking this up and the difference is around 1%, so if you’re worried about caffeine intake you’re better off leaving a mouthful in the bottom of your cup than changing beans.

    • TheDubz87@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve honestly never thought of that. Guess that’s why I’ve not been able to feel a real difference in my morning coffee when I use different roasts. I always thought “well it can’t be losing that much caffeine because it doesn’t feel any different than my medium or light roasts.”