• graphito@sopuli.xyzM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    In my opinion, random meme is not an appropriate place to discuss moderation in general – it’s unwieldy to have such things plastered all over the community/instance

    Additionally, public discussions invite way too many responses on whole array of topics besides issue at hand

    Lastly, public debate in text can easily be misrepresented, taken out of context, blown out of proportion etc etc

    However this all is only my opinion, given good reasoning, anything could be reconsidered

    • CapeWearingAeroplane@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I definitely see your point, but at the same time, isn’t public debate in text the best tool we have here for an open discussion?

      Regardless, I can understand, and respect, that you don’t want to spend time on public discussions about moderation. As “some mod somewhere” once said: If you don’t like how it’s being done, become a mod yourself. I can respect that.

      • BolexForSoup@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        What you are advocating for is laudable, but it is not reality because it assumes good faith actors. Open dialogue and free speech is often just a cudgel for those who are trying to cause problems.

      • graphito@sopuli.xyzM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        isn’t public debate in text the best tool we have here for an open discussion?

        I want to believe this is true but such “best tool” requires substantial amount of resources to enact and maintain. And even then we might simply receive bad rep for overinvolvement

        From a user standpoint, I think anyone interested in higher quality moderation should either try !humor@beehaw.org or indeed involve oneself in moderation of this community