• TigrisMorte@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    1 year ago

    No one denies it. What they deny is that the Hospital itself was a command center for hamas. It wasn’t. It was a hospital. And Israel killed a bunch of innocent people to dig outside and find the tunnel. There is no excuse for slaughtering innocents. It is a war crime regardless of any justification.

    • Hatsune Miku @lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      hiiii~ it’s not actually a war-crime according to Article 19 of the Geneva Convention.

      nawt defending iswael, just pointing out it’s legally not a war-crime :(

        • S491@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          based on the fact the account is fairly new and that ive seen them in other posts only posting pro Israel comments, I think this maybe a shill account

      • OccamsTeapot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        The protection to which civilian hospitals are entitled shall not cease unless they are used to commit, outside their humanitarian duties, acts harmful to the enemy. Protection may, however, cease only after due warning has been given, naming, in all appropriate cases, a reasonable time limit, and after such warning has remained unheeded.

        Emphasis mine. Because was there a reasonable warning? “Take these intensive care patients through an active war zone, oh and btw you’re surrounded” doesn’t seem to apply

        And…

        The fact that sick or wounded members of the armed forces are nursed in these hospitals, or the presence of small arms and ammunition taken from such combatants which have not yet been handed to the proper service, shall not be considered to be acts harmful to the enemy.

        Which seems to be a all that was going on. The tunnels are everywhere, and do not constitute the hospital being used to commit acts harmful to the enemy.

        I guess you may be trolling (Because I hope this is not just how you write) but this type of claim is common. Doesn’t pass the sniff test and I am yet to see a convincing legal justification

      • TigrisMorte@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        It is a war crime.

        “The fact that sick or wounded members of the armed forces are nursed in these hospitals, or the presence of small arms and ammunition taken from such combatants which have not yet been handed to the proper service, shall not be considered to be acts harmful to the enemy.”

        Thus far the only actual evidence is that there were tunnels below the hospital. Everyone already knew that. The entire place is a web of tunnels. No one was running anything but health care inside the hospital.