For context: The thread was about why people hate Hexbear and Lemmygrad instances

  • FrenLivesMatter@lemmy.todayEnglish
    4·
    1 year ago

    Do you really think when people say “eat the rich” they mean “eat farmers?”

    No, I brought that up because that’s what historically happened. And in light of that, continuing to use a phrase like that at least seems to be somewhat poor in taste. But that’s besides the point.

    Do you really think if Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates and Elon Musk all died today that the world would be worse off?

    I honestly don’t know, but what makes you think the world would be better off if they were dead? Unless they had pledged all their money to charity (which I believe Gates has actually done), what would their deaths really change for you and I?

    Getting rid of them will definitely not “get rid of the knowledge” because the only knowledge they have is how to buy the right financial advisors.

    That might be true for people who inherited all of their wealth, but if that’s what you’re trying to say, you picked some piss poor examples, because all three of them weren’t born anywhere near as wealthy as they are now and took some considerable risks in order to get there, and they all created literally tens, if not hundreds of thousands of jobs in the process, most of them rather well paid (though we can certainly argue about Amazon).

    Just to be perfectly clear, I’m by no means saying that things are okay the way they are, and that all we have to do is let rich people continue to do whatever they want. All I’m saying is that things aren’t as simple as we want them to be and the easy solution is rarely the correct one.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldEnglish
      13·
      1 year ago

      what makes you think the world would be better off if they were dead?

      They provide no value and pay almost no taxes. Without them hoarding their money, it would get circulated.

      All billionaires are money hoarders. They have more money than they can possibly spend in a single lifetime. And if you think their charities are truly benevolent, you should look into them a little deeper.

      Please, though, name a multibillionaire who is essential. Who the world will not be as good if they won’t be around. Just one. One billionaire that provides value to more than shareholders.

      • FrenLivesMatter@lemmy.todayEnglish
        3·
        1 year ago

        This isn’t about whether or not billionaires are essential, but whether getting rid of them would substantially change anything.

        Assume, for instance, that we make owning (or earning) more than a billion dollars (per year) illegal by putting a 100% tax on every dollar afterwards. Then billionaires would simply move most of their assets abroad or find some other loophole that lets them avoid this, like setting up a bunch of smaller companies that each have $999 million. Unless the whole world follows suit, it won’t change anything, and that’s not going to happen because any country that’s willing to give them a safe haven would make a killing by doing so.

        Also, if this DID happen, what makes you think they’d continue to work trying to make more money and not just spend more time playing golf instead? Whatever revenue you’d expect in taxes would simply not occur because once there’s no more incentive to earn more, there’s no more incentive to produce. Ironically, it would probably lead to far more quasi-billionaires because other multi-millionaires would likely pick up the slack where the big guys throw the towel, but I don’t see how regular people would benefit.

        But perhaps you can explain what you have in mind?

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldEnglish
          9·
          1 year ago

          Sounds like you’re saying Billionaires don’t contribute anything and their money would be better used in other ways by getting rid of them and redistributing it.

          Agreed. Eat the rich.

          • FrenLivesMatter@lemmy.todayEnglish
            3·
            1 year ago

            Okay, honestly, would you eat a Bill Gates or Elon Musk? They don’t look particularly tasty to me. Bezos maybe, he seems to be in good shape (although likely chock full of steroids), but the vast majority of them are frumpy old dudes or dudettes who probably taste like leather. I don’t think that eating them would be particularly enjoyable.