It’s been a long journey, but here we arrive. Welcome home.

  • nii236@lemmy.jtmn.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    2 years ago

    People are so confused and overwhelmed about the fediverse mechanics though.

    Maybe there is room for a product that is an aggregator for aggregators. Like, a centralised service that scrapes and collects all Lemmy instances into one super instance.

    • hal@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 years ago

      Its actually simple. Tell them, its like Email. You have an email account at gmail, but can perfectly fine have email conversation with someone on outllook. Lemmy instance = the same as a web email interface of any email provider. Most people will get their head around that.

      • fennec@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 years ago

        As soon as you have to explain the fediverse to someone using analogies my experience is that most people have already given up. They just can’t be bothered to learn something new.

      • sake@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        I love this. Perfect analogy because it’s literally the same.

        Got to say I’m really excited that nobody can own the master instance of say this channel. If some channel goes rogue, there can be easily a competing instance that challenges the top spot. And the same applies to servers themselves. Everyone has to cooperate or you will be excluded.

      • brewvarlet@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Ohhhh I kept hearing the email analogy but never WHY it was like email. Thanks for the ELI5!

    • l4sgc@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 years ago

      Pardon my confusion since I’m new to the fediverse as well, but isn’t every Lemmy instance like the super instance you are describing? You can access any community on any instance from any other; there are commentors in this thread from beehaw.org, lemmy.world, lemmy.sdf.org, programming.dev, and many others.

      • nii236@lemmy.jtmn.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        Nah those are like sibling instances. I’m talking about a parent instance that combines all the children instances with a new community that aggregates multiple remote communities.

        Just thinking out loud, haven’t really fleshed out the idea yet.

        • Balthazar@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 years ago

          That already exists. ATM, the thing you’re confusing it with is that there are 4-5 “gaming” subs, but eventually if one gets big enough or the others get taken in by one this will happen, and it’ll look like this instance “Technology@Beehaw.org” (p.s. I’m accessing this from Sopuli, so not on Beehaw).

          • nii236@lemmy.jtmn.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            I guess its just a natural progression of being absorbed by other communities that are larger. What I was getting at was a new feature that combines multiple communities into a single one on the backend and presents them as a single one (with interleaved posts/comments from all 5 communities or whatever)

        • Headless3638@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 years ago

          Yeah, I think I get it - there’s a bunch of smaller gaming@<lemmy-instance> kind of things, you’re talking about a master c/gaming that combines all of the smaller lemmy instances of gaming channels, right?

      • Setarkus.MX@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        From what I know, the instances share the posts between each other, but they need to have had contact with another instance somehow before they can get posts from there. Something like a user searching for an instance that isn’t yet known to their “home” instance yet or following a link to it.
        As I understood it, this lets the instances know of each other. Posts of unknown instances won’t show up on your instance until the connection has been made.
        So maybe a super instance could somehow include a newly created instance as soon as it has connected with any other instance already in the super instance.

        (might not be too coherent since I know little about this all as of now ^^)

        • l4sgc@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Wouldn’t the home instance already have to know about the remote instance in some way for it to show up in that initial user’s search?

    • patatahooligan@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      I don’t think such an aggregator is required. Interoperability is smooth enough that you don’t have to think about different instances most of the time. I’ve only really noticed two points that would be confusing:

      • the sign up process
      • the “local”/“all” distinction

      So I think what we really need to do to make this platform intuitive to people that aren’t already familiar with it is:

      • Somehow streamline signing up. The process from googling Lemmy to having an account on an instance should not be confusing or intimidating.
      • Filter by “all” by default. The default should cater to the users which are less likely to figure it out themselves. If you don’t understand what instances are and what “local” vs “all” means, then you are probably here for the “all” experience. If you understand and really want “local” you are probably fine having to set it yourself.