The plaintiffs’ arguments in Moore v. United States have little basis in law — unless you think that a list of long-ago-discarded laissez-faire decisions from the early 20th century remain good law. And a decision favoring these plaintiffs could blow a huge hole in the federal budget. While no Warren-style wealth tax is on the books, the Moore plaintiffs do challenge an existing tax that is expected to raise $340 billion over the course of a decade.

But Republicans also hold six seats on the nation’s highest Court, so there is some risk that a majority of the justices will accept the plaintiffs’ dubious legal arguments. And if they do so, they could do considerable damage to the government’s ability to fund itself.

  • Madison420@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wrong again bud, you should do actual research before you pop off.

    You’re being an idiot, if I call you fam it’s a familiar term. We aren’t familiar and I clearly think you’re a bigoted shitstain.

    You’re a bigot, at least be an honest bigot. An ashamed Nazi is s still a Nazi.

    • SCB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      We’re definitely familiar. I’ve fucked a lot of people I’ve spoken to less than you

      • Madison420@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s not a brag that just makes you a shitty person but we already know you don’t think much of the opposite sex.

        You’re a bigot, at least be an honest bigot. An ashamed Nazi is still a Nazi after all.

        • SCB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Why would having consensual sex with people after very little time make me a bad person?

          Let’s unpack your issues with sexuality.

          • Madison420@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            To anyone else that I don’t know to be for a fact to be a misogynistic bigot it doesn’t, in your case it’s just additional shitty behavior.

            Let’s unpack your bigotry. Why do you insist on calling everyone crazy .

            You’re a bigot at least be an honest bigot. An ashamed Nazi is still a Nazi

            • SCB@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I don’t call everyone crazy. I call you crazy because it’s our fun little game.

              • Madison420@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Lol, nice cover “I’m not always a douchebag, just most of the time”. I can you a Nazi, not because it’s a fun game but because you almost certainly goosestep with gusto.

                You’re a bigot, at least be an honest bigot. An ashamed Nazi is still a Nazi.

                • SCB@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Lol my nickname in college with an entire friend ground was “douchebag” because I am indeed a lovable douche.

                  I can’t really goose-step tho. Sports injuries. :(

                  • Madison420@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    You’re certainly a douche, lovable not so much I can’t say I find any bigot lovable. Similarly those people probably weren’t your friends, they probably told you “jokingly” to go the fuck away but you can’t take a hint.

                    Douchebaggery ain’t a sport, sport.

                    You’re a bigot, at least be an honest bigot. An ashamed Nazi is still a Nazi.