dantheclamman@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 年前After 151 years, Popular Science will no longer offer a magazinewww.theverge.comexternal-linkmessage-square23fedilinkarrow-up1319 cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldhackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanshackernews@derp.footechnology@lemmit.online
arrow-up1319external-linkAfter 151 years, Popular Science will no longer offer a magazinewww.theverge.comdantheclamman@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 年前message-square23fedilink cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldhackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanshackernews@derp.footechnology@lemmit.online
minus-squarerockSlayer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up48·2 年前Same with the history channel. It’s almost like the unrelenting pursuit of profit destroys interesting niches in the name of widespread appeal
minus-squareRadicalCandour@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkarrow-up15·2 年前Aka your classic enshitification model.
minus-squarepiecat@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-22 年前Huh, that’s just enshitification with TV
minus-squarebillwashere@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 年前Seems like there’s a word for this……
Same with the history channel. It’s almost like the unrelenting pursuit of profit destroys interesting niches in the name of widespread appeal
Network decay, a common pattern.
Aka your classic enshitification model.
Huh, that’s just enshitification with TV
Seems like there’s a word for this……