I just got up from conversation with a couple of older black men, that I said “well I got to go back to work and start cracking the whip.” And it occurred to me then that it was probably a really insensitive stupid thing to say.

Sadly, it hadn’t occurred to me until it’s already said.

  • Sethayy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Kinda broad statement considering some do but some are offended by it.

    Of course its entirely incorrect given they aren’t in India, so it seems obvious not to call them indian (shit even some actual east Indians are offended by it, especially cause now they need to be called east indians)

    and more anecdotally all indigenous people I’ve met couldn’t careless what theyre called down to calling themselves ‘indjiuns’

    • ikanreed@mastodon.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      @Sethayy the existence of people not offended by something prejudiced always seems to be dragged out as a justification for that prejudice.

      If some people being offended isn’t reason enough not to say something, then it stands to reason that some people not being offended isn’t a reason why it’s okay.

      If it is, then there are definitely people who are offended.

      • CALIGVLA@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Okay, but what if they like being called indian as opposed to native american? Now you’re being offensive to those people. It’s kind of like that ridiculous latinx term that some PC people have being pushing for a few years now, I’m yet to meet anyone thay likes being called that as opposed to just latino/latina.

        If you’re in doubt what to call someone, just ask, don’t assume.

      • Sethayy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Excellent! So let’s just call them what country they live in, which isn’t India (nor even close to India)

    • snowe@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      My wife works on reservations. I haven’t heard of any of the tribes she works with being fine with being called Native American. They have their own government organization called the Bureau of Indian Affairs, it seems pretty clear that they prefer that term.

        • snowe@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Not really. If you’re struggling with it it’s a you problem (and probably partially racism to boot). This isn’t a hard concept. Mexicans are Americans, Canadians are Americans, Peruvians are Americans, even though none of them live in the USA. Just because we (white people) decided to call two locations India doesn’t mean that only one group gets that name. That’s idiotic.

          • Sethayy@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            This is halarious, youre definitely american aren’t you?

            Canadians aren’t in america eh? Absolutely no classification we can think of, perhaps a continent or 2 that could describe let’s say a north and south “america” of some sort?

            Id encourage you to try and find another true analogy though, and you’ll see it doesnt exist - cause everywhere else’s name is based on where it is

            also I gotta edit to add this, I’d love to see where you perceive racism in my comment, just as a readers exercise

            • snowe@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Canadians aren’t in america eh? Absolutely no classification we can think of, perhaps a continent or 2 that could describe let’s say a north and south “america” of some sort?

              are you purposefully misreading my comments? it’s like you’re trying to read the exact opposite of what I said.

              also I gotta edit to add this, I’d love to see where you perceive racism in my comment, just as a readers exercise

              you literally said that a group shouldn’t be called what it wants to be because it’s not from a specific region. that’s literally racism. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/racism

              • Sethayy@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Canadians are called american cause they’re in NORTH AMERICA, not cause US has a monopoly on the classification american.

                The rest I’m outta energy to argue but essentially yeah don’t use blanket terms

                • snowe@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Canadians are called american cause they’re in NORTH AMERICA, not cause US has a monopoly on the classification american.

                  Yes… exactly. dude. you literally just proved my point. India does not have a monopoly on the classification Indian. Holy fuck dude.

                  • Sethayy@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    This has gotta be intentional stupidity at this point right?

                    You understand things in time happen in a linearr order right? Ie if someone hurt me then I hurt them, they’re the bad guy. I hurt someone and they hurt me 🫢 an entirely different scenario