• Rent in NYC where I live is insane. My partner and I recently toured a place where they broke up the basement of a building into 4 apartments, none of which had a real bedroom, and were asking for $3k each

    • cmbabul@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is a trend everywhere, I just recently moved to different apartment and I’d say 8/10 apartments I saw on Zillow and the other sites were these “open concept” or whatever 1 bedrooms and hallway kitchens. It’s depressing

      • SCB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Move to Ohio and you can buy a house for significantly less than your current rent.

        • Asafum@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          And work?

          These answers are always aimed at WFH “professionals” but blue collar schmucks like me always get the short end of that stick ever since the WFH trend kicked up. I have to live within range of a job that I have to physically be at (I’ve done the 1 1/2 hr drive one way) and any lcol area that I look in doesn’t have anything even remotely close that pays enough to not make it a relative repeat of my current situation just with lower numbers. It’s not that easy for everyone to just do.

          • SCB@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            There are lots of blue collar jobs in Ohio, yes.

            Idk how to answer beyond that without specifics but my point is that changing jobs within your skillset and moving for opportunities is basically what the country was built on, and is not a new concept.

            If you’re not willing to relocate or change roles for more money there’s not a lot anyone can do for you.

            I began my career as a high school teacher. Had I remained one, I would make less than half what I make now. Had to change jobs and states to grow my wealth.

    • interceder270@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Supply and demand.

      You can always move somewhere else and have hope of one day owning property. Or you can rent forever and have nothing to pass on to your kids.

      The choice is yours. I wouldn’t wait around for others to solve your problems.

      • Mandarbmax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Ya, people should be forced to move away from their family and friends and home by insane cost of living and instead of sympathy we should just expect them to single handedly solve an entire fucked up economic system.

        🤡

        • Daft_ish@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m torn on this one. I do think people should live near their friends and family but if the living situation was totally untenable I’m sure they wouldn’t want me to struggle. At the same time, they aren’t going to help me pay the bills so how much do they really care anyway?

            • interceder270@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              What are you talking about? I support spreading out so there are more developed areas that people want to live.

              Passing a bunch of money around in major cities is what exacerbates the disparity in wealth. Why should city people who already have more wealth get even more before those who have less?

              • Psychodelic@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                I really don’t think that’s how any of this works, dude

                You need to invest in areas if you want them to be “developed” so people want to live in them. If you force poor people to leave places where there are more opportunities (e.g. economic, educational, occupational, etc.) for them, you’re basically dooming them and their following generations to poverty. This is why I said you support low social mobility and high income inequality.

                Now just think of who the poorest people are in cities - it’s a lot of minorities, single parents, people in debt, etc. That should immediately tell you “city people” don’t have more wealth than most people elsewhere. As far as I can tell, the working class anywhere serve mainly to enrich the wealthy class.

                I’ve always looked at it this way: should the people that scrub toilets in NY or SF or LA be paid enough to live in the same city? Everything I’ve seen tells me the average American answers this question with a resounding “No!” People in those areas have to make hour-long commutes to put food on the table for their family. I don’t see why we should accept essential workers being paid less than they deserve.

                • interceder270@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  That’s exactly how it works. Why do you think it’s more expensive to live in major cities than outside of them? Supply and demand. There’s more demand and less supply. Why is there more demand? Because more people would prefer to live there.

                  Why should we invest in major cities that have already reached diminishing returns on their investments instead of spreading out to make more places attractive to more people? Entitlement. Life outside of major cities isn’t good enough for some, and they think people living in major cities should get more before everyone else who has less.