return2ozma@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · vor 3 JahrenReturn to office is ‘dead,’ Stanford economist says. Here’s whywww.cnbc.comexternal-linkmessage-square58fedilinkarrow-up1370cross-posted to: futurology@futurology.todaytechnology@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmit.onlinehackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanshackernews@derp.foo
arrow-up1370external-linkReturn to office is ‘dead,’ Stanford economist says. Here’s whywww.cnbc.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · vor 3 Jahrenmessage-square58fedilinkcross-posted to: futurology@futurology.todaytechnology@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmit.onlinehackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanshackernews@derp.foo
minus-squareKecessa@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-2vor 3 JahrenThat’s what I meant, why should we need to go to court to get that right recognized when it should be the government changing the law without court intervention?
That’s what I meant, why should we need to go to court to get that right recognized when it should be the government changing the law without court intervention?