For Context: I live in the United States of America.

  • 001100 010010@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I don’t really care about the Capitalist-Socialist spectrum, I just want to live a normal happy life without tyrannical oppression. Capitalists are evil, and so far any Communist/Socialist societies have become totalitarian regimes and now ended up as Capitalist anyways, but even worse than your typical Capitalist country that still has democracy (China is a State-Capitalist country with no democracy, ironic, given how Communist they claim to be).

    • GrayBackgroundMusic@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      so far any communist/socialist societies have become totalitarian regimes

      Uh. You need to broaden your perspective. 1) many countries in Europe have more socialistic governments than the USA. 2) socialism is a spectrum with varying levels. The USA while ostensibly capitalist, has socialist roads and schools and police.

      • intensely_human@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        Socialism is when people own the means of production. I’d argue that’s different than infrastructure, though it is a murky line between infrastructure and capital.

        • diskmaster23
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Socialism is a range. It’s a tough concept to understand, but once you do, you become more…flexible

          • intensely_human@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Last time someone dropped “you don’t understand socialism” on me I asked them for their definition and I got a youtube video of a professor giving me the definition I gave above.

            Is that not the definition you use of socialism? How do you define it?

            I’ll remind you that bones enable faster locomotion, and they accomplish it by their inflexibility. Clear, non-fluid concepts can do that too. We need a solid, simple definition of socialism to make any progress here don’t you think?

            • diskmaster23
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I agree, but that isn’t reality. Even Richard Wolff agrees that there is a spectrum.

              • intensely_human@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                But what’s at one end of the spectrum here?

                Light is a spectrum, and the ends of that spectrum are defined: 0 frequency at one end and infinite frequency at the other. A spectrum covering an infinite number of points ranging between two precise, simple definitions.

                I define socialism as: joint ownership of the means of production by the people

                I like the definition of capitalism as this, from wikipedia:

                Capitalism is an economic system based on the private ownership of the means of production and their operation for profit. Central characteristics of capitalism include capital accumulation, competitive markets, price systems, private property, property rights recognition, voluntary exchange, and wage labor.

                My short snarky definition is: Capitalism is the economic system where cooperation requires consent.

        • Elkaki123@vlemmy.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          No no, socialims is when I have two cows and the government eats one of them (or something like that, I didn’t advance much in my theory)