- Makes me wonder if anyone out there is maintaining a list of (I can’t believe I’m about to say this) privacy-respecting cars - I honestly do not understand their rating system. Every one of them looks to have exactly the same rating (Mozilla says 👎, People voted super creepy), but then they have a sort by least or most creepy. What gives? - Edit: nevermind looks like there are some that are “very creepy”. This rating system is kind of obtuse. - Because they are all creepy, and not one of those companies give a damn about privacy or security…and why should they? Companies can’t get in trouble for anything ever… 
- I love the idea but hate how Mozilla did this 
- yeah the rating system is poorly executed. the articles on the other hand are quite a good read. 
 
 
- Mozilla’s “least to most creepy” ranking is the best resource I’ve found so far: - https://foundation.mozilla.org/en/privacynotincluded/categories/cars/ 
- I would think most cars before 2010 should be okay. Infotainment was pretty rudimentary at that point - Infotainment? Do you mean adverdataharvestment? - Yeah, that’s pretty accurate 
 
 
 
- I prefer my car just be a car! I am definitely getting old. - No, you aren’t. You just haven’t been conditioned your whole life to accept 100% surveillance. 
 
- When I went to trade school in 2010 for automotive repair our instructors told us this was going to happen. At the time, I thought they were just grumpy old men who didn’t like that cars were becoming more and more electronic. How wrong I was 
- I want to thank the Automakers for giving me more reasons to ride a bike! 🤗 🤗 
- Typical Washington bluster for optics. Auto manufacturers and their unions contribute too much money to politicians, nothing will be done. 
- Are there any modern cars without this problem? It makes sense that they steal data considering how many have wifi and bluetooth - I guess only the ones without Internet connection 
 
- This is the best summary I could come up with: 
 - And like many technologically engaged Ars Technica readers, he does not like what he sees in terms of automakers’ approach to data privacy. - On Friday, Sen. Markey wrote to 14 car companies with a variety of questions about data privacy policies, urging them to do better. - The problems were widespread—most automakers collect too much personal data and are too eager to sell or share it with third parties, the foundation found. - Markey noted the Mozilla Foundation report in his letters, which were sent to BMW, Ford, General Motors, Honda, Hyundai, Kia, Mazda, Mercedes-Benz, Nissan, Stellantis, Subaru, Tesla, Toyota, and Volkswagen. - The senator is concerned about the large amounts of data that modern cars can collect, including the troubling potential to use biometric data (like the rate a driver blinks and breathes, as well as their pulse) to infer mood or mental health. - "Although certain data collection and sharing practices may have real benefits, consumers should not be subject to a massive data collection apparatus, with any disclosures hidden in pages-long privacy policies filled with legalese. 
 - The original article contains 282 words, the summary contains 175 words. Saved 38%. I’m a bot and I’m open source! 







