• Taco@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Uhhhhh care to elaborate? Because that statement could be seen as defamatory

    • DroneRights [it/its]@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      It is defamatory, I don’t want a transphobe to be famous. Stamets called me a troll for identifying as nonbinary. We had a conversation about an asexual nonbinary character in Star Trek who gets surgically and socially conditioned into a heterosexual woman. I said maybe that’s a better nonbinary horror story than a transfemme liberation story. Stamets, a cis guy, insisted that his interpretation is the only correct one because nobody really identifies like this character, and the fact I say I’m nonbinary like this character makes me a troll.

      • gnuplusmatt@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Staments is generally very attacky, he plays childish games with people who disagree with him. But people defend him/he gets a pass because of all the memes he reposts from other sources.

        His behaviour (and also the fact there is no new star trek at the moment) has me hardly using my account on startrek.website

        • DroneRights [it/its]@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          My impressions of him align with yours perfectly, and I’d love to have more evidence of his poor behaviour to present in situations like this. Can you tell me more?

          • gnuplusmatt@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I mean its just bickering about startrek here - but when you go to a specific instance to talk about star trek and he plays edit games to belittle people it sort of takes the fun out it. It’s nothing as serious as gender/identity etc