haxor@derp.fooMB to Hacker News@derp.fooEnglish · 1 year agoTesla Cybertruck's stiff structure, sharp design raise safety concernswww.reuters.comexternal-linkmessage-square15fedilinkarrow-up144file-textcross-posted to: fuckcars@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmit.onlinetechnology@lemmy.world
arrow-up144external-linkTesla Cybertruck's stiff structure, sharp design raise safety concernswww.reuters.comhaxor@derp.fooMB to Hacker News@derp.fooEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square15fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: fuckcars@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmit.onlinetechnology@lemmy.world
minus-squareTheFriar@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up32·1 year ago U.S. regulators rely on vehicle makers to self-test and certify their adherence to safety standards. Sure. Sounds like a great system. What motivation could a company have besides doing good for others?
minus-squareAwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·1 year agoThere are independent crash test ratings like JD Power and Associates, which is what most consumers check.
minus-squareKnusper@feddit.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·1 year agoWell, because consumers shouldn’t need to be experts. You want experts to make these decisions, because lives are at risk.
minus-squareyouRFate@feddit.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 year agoYes, people check how safe they are inside the truck. The truck posing a threat to others must be regulated by the govt.
Sure. Sounds like a great system. What motivation could a company have besides doing good for others?
There are independent crash test ratings like JD Power and Associates, which is what most consumers check.
And we shouldn’t have to.
deleted by creator
Well, because consumers shouldn’t need to be experts. You want experts to make these decisions, because lives are at risk.
Yes, people check how safe they are inside the truck. The truck posing a threat to others must be regulated by the govt.
Killing all humans?