The UN warns that half the population of Gaza is starving and nine out of ten people there can’t eat every day - as Israeli bombardment of the territory continues

A hospital boss in Khan Younis, southern Gaza, says his team has “lost control” over the numbers of dead and wounded arriving at the facility

The city is surrounded by Israeli tanks on two sides; the Israeli military says it’s fighting from house to house

The death of an Israeli hostage - Sahar Baruch, 25 - has been confirmed by his kibbutz and a hostages’ group, following reports of a failed Israeli rescue operation

On Friday, the US blocked a resolution at the UN Security Council calling for an immediate humanitarian ceasefire, arguing this would be dangerous and unrealistic

  • girlfreddy@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 year ago

    So Biden et al. think that starving thousands to death is less brutal than pushing Netanyahu to sign a ceasefire is.

    Yeah, whatever.

    • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      The in practice analysis seems to be that Biden’s calculating that Israel listening to US diplomacy is worth more than Israel being compelled by international force.

      The behind the scenes negotiations the US has been pushing have seen hostage swaps along with concessions regarding the post war situation like Gaza being able to develop their natural resource economy.

      Basically he’s using the public image of defending Israel to have more soft power since Israel’s response to international condemnations has been “fuck you I do what I want!” anyways.

      • sun_is_ra@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        but by doing so he is causing lot of damage to his image, american reputation and even to Ukraine. Am 100% against putin but its funny to see him getting arrest warrant for kidnapping ukrainian children while Israel gets pass for killing 17k person of them lot of children and women. It didnt even sign the genieva convension.

        • MagicShel@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s definitely a hard call by Biden. There are no right, easy answers to the problem. What I know with absolute certainty is I’d rather have Biden handling the situation than Trump. I don’t like the way it looks and feels, but I know we’re at least doing better than the alternative.

          • bamboo@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            I genuinely can’t see how Trump could have responded to Israel’s actions here worse than Biden. The rhetoric states side might have been more toxic, but Biden has been cheering on the genocide about as hard as anyone could, and doesn’t seem to have any real victories towards peace. I guess maybe they avoided an Israeli ground invasion in Lebanon, if that was actually in the cards?

        • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Less a pass and more a shield of 75 years of “if you disagree you’re an antisemite!” giving the west a flinch reaction

          It also doesn’t help Russia’s side of the equation that their response to this is often, “WHY DON’T WE GET TO DO IT THEN‽”

    • NeuronautML@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The military industrial complex can’t profit from peace. The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is a gold mine.

        • Rapidcreek@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          It did not. I’ve never seen a time when the UN and individual countries didn’t protest the holding of hostages.

            • Rapidcreek@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Finally found it.

              release of all hostages, as well as ensuring humanitarian access.

              Means that both are guaranteed to happen. But only one party is part of the UN and bound to the decision.

              That is the reason for the veto IMO.

              • OccamsTeapot@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                11
                ·
                1 year ago

                Finally found it.

                I would hope so, it’s literally the 2nd paragraph 🤣

                Means that both are guaranteed to happen. But only one party is part of the UN and bound to the decision.

                That’s why it’s the security council. They could actually enforce it. But it’s a shame getting the hostages out in exchange for stopping the mass murder is not enough motivation.

                • Rapidcreek@reddthat.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  It would be simple. Hamas could surrender and lay down their weapons. Release the hostages. But, no. They still fire rockets at Israel, they still fight house to house.

        • blahsay@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          No it didn’t. It ‘demanded’ their release which Hamas would have said nah to obviously.

          • NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            Hamas wants to release the hostages, as part of a ceasefire deal that actually secures their interests (mostly freeing Palestinian hostages detainees and loosening the blockade). Like it or not this is the status quo Israel created with their won hands.

  • blahsay@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hamas needs to surrender and let the hostages go. That ends the war. Simple and clearly the best thing for their people. So much suffering easily averted.

    They won’t though - Palestinians dying for propaganda was they whole reason they attacked and started this war.

    Hamas are the architects of the greatest betrayal in history.

    • chitak166@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t think giving up their only leverage ‘ends the war.’

      But I could be wrong. Problem is, there’s no going back once that’s done.

      I see you’re pushing the Zionist talking point that Hamas would prefer defeat over victory, which is just asinine.

      • blahsay@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yes Hamas continuing to torture hostages and maintain leverage is definitely more important than the Palestinians 🤮

          • mycatiskai
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            1 year ago

            They also ignored that the Jewish hostages that were released were more worried that Israel would bomb them than their captors would kill them.

  • catch22@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Prepare for the horror and condemnation in the future when there is a solidarity car or suicide bomb in Israel from America and the UK et al. Why would these evil terrorists do such things

    • chitak166@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      “We get to do whatever want to you, and you don’t get to fight back!”

      Who wouldn’t be eager to take that deal?