• ShortN0te@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Not really. Just because they reverse engineered the protocol does not mean it is insecure.

    I guess we know too little to say much about that topic.

    • M500@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well if it’s all handled by Apple I can assume that there is a reasonable amount of security in the way the message is stored.

      If a third party gets involved, then I don’t know if the message is read, copied, or stored insecurely by them.

      • ShortN0te@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well if it’s all handled by Apple I can assume that there is a reasonable amount of security in the way the message is stored.

        If a third party gets involved, then I don’t know if the message is read, copied, or stored insecurely by them.

        I reall hope apples does not store or can even read the data. Otherwise it would be a really bad messaging protocol (privacy and security wise).

      • duncesplayed
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        If a third party gets involved and you don’t know if they message is read, thennone of your messages were ever secure to begin with.

        Apple can’t have it both ways here.

        Is iMessage secure? Yes or no. There’s no inbetween.

        If the answer is “yes”, then it’s impossible for Beeper to be doing anything that would compromise that security.

        If the answer is “no”, then under what justification are they shutting it down?