• new_guy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    At first glance, none.

    But then “willingness” and “money” rarely mix well. Yeah, there are humans “willing” to be paid for their plasma but it’s a marginalized part of the population trying to have just enough money to survive.

    I’m sorry. I’m trying not to ruin the meme any further.

    • schmidtster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      People donate blood, plasma, sperm and breast milk from all walks of life already. Some get paid too.

      If you want it to be about a particular group in can be, but even well off people donate/get money for their bodily fluids.

      • new_guy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Donation is one thing completely different than selling their fluids. There’s no incentive to exploit people when there’s not a payback in cash.

        • schmidtster@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          And people sell them too already. They aren’t exploited.

          Yeah there will be people that try to abuse it, that applies to literally everything in life and should never be the reason to not do something.

            • schmidtster@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Unless they are forced to it can’t be exploitation.

              Now if they work health benefits into instead of just paying better wages, that would be more on the exploitation side. But thats the bad eggs ruining it for the other 98% that don’t abuse it.

              • Sybil@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                it’s definitely exploitation. you just don’t like the connotation. they are being exploited for their blood just like a well is exploited for oil a mountain is exploited for minerals and forests are exploited for wood.

                • schmidtster@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Exploit has multiple meanings, exploiting a resource and exploiting someone in an underhand or unfair way do have the same phrase to explain them. But exploiting a resource is obviously much different than treating workers unfairly.

                  Verbs and nouns typically have different meanings for the same word, maybe time for an English refresher.

                  • Sybil@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    since you clearly went to a dictionary, you can see none of the definitions even mention “force”.

                  • Sybil@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    I’m using it correctly. don’t be condescending. you might think it’s a fair exploitation, but it’s exploitation nonetheless.

                  • Sybil@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    mounds and greens have nothing to do with this. we are only using the transitive verb here.