A court in Romania has rejected a request by influencer Andrew Tate to return assets that were seized during investigations into the case in which he is charged with human trafficking, rape and forming a criminal gang to sexually exploit women.
I think freezing assets is a common practice when said assets may be put towards restitution for the victims if found guilty.
I have no idea how Romainia does it, or if they can be trusted to actually put the money towards the victims. But on paper, it seems like it could be for good reasons.
Or it could be for civil forfeiture kind of abuse of authority. Guess we’ll have to wait and see.
I think freezing assets is a common practice when said assets may be put towards restitution for the victims if found guilty.
I have no idea how Romainia does it, or if they can be trusted to actually put the money towards the victims. But on paper, it seems like it could be for good reasons.
Or it could be for civil forfeiture kind of abuse of authority. Guess we’ll have to wait and see.
OR we could become experts in the Romanian legal system
Hm? I became one upon opening the comments section.
That’s what I was thinking, but I’m not an expert on the Romanian legal system either.