Israeli officials are facing backlash after years of Prime Minister Benjamin “Bibi” Netanyahu quietly allowing Hamas to remain in power.

But reporting in the New York Times has revealed that Netanyahu’s government was more hands-on about helping Hamas: they helped a Qatari diplomat bring suitcases of cash into Gaza, indirectly boosting the militant organization, according to the report.

The calculus — the Times reported on Sunday, citing Israeli officials, Netanyahu’s critics, and the man’s own reported statements — was to keep Hamas strong enough to counteract the Palestinian Authority in the West Bank, allowing Netanyahu to avoid a two-state peace solution and keep both sides weak.

Israeli security officials got it wrong; they didn’t think Hamas was capable, or even interested, in launching a large attack against the Jewish state.

  • GoodEye8@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Given the thousands of rockets fired at Israel by Hamas from Gaza every year, the international community is understanding of a blockade being put in place.

    Is somehow understandable by the international community

    Denying the passage of aid across that blockade however would be seen as far worse.

    Not aid, money. And somehow not understandable by the international community despite the US verifying that the money sent goes to Hamas? So preventing funds for those rockets is not understandable by the international community?

    • Tavarin@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Money is aid. Money can buy food, and water, and whatever other supplies a state needs.

      • GoodEye8@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        If money is aid then money is also bombs, rockets, WMD parts etc. Money is just an object of exchange that may be used to buy aid. But it doesn’t make it aid, just like it doesn’t make it a bomb.

        • Tavarin@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          But unlike sending food, it is non-perishable, and can allow a country to buy what it needs. Money is aid.

          • GoodEye8@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            In that case money is also bombs and it would actually make sense to prevent it from entering Gaza.

            • Tavarin@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              And now you have an even worse humanitarian crisis, and a pissed off international community because you’ve denied aid to Gaza. Congrats, you’re a terrible world leader.

              • GoodEye8@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Actual aid is not prevent so nobody gives a fuck. Nobody also gives a fuck about every other action take by Israel that is deepening the humanitarian crisis in Gaza. Literally nothing would change for Israel, except Hamas wouldn’t get that money.

                Now before you continue your mental circlejerk to not accept being wrong remember, you’re the one defending Netanyahu right now. He wanted that money in Gaza and he made sure it would make it there. If you want to keep defending Netanyahu, go ahead.

                • Tavarin@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Now before you continue your mental circlejerk

                  Pot, meet kettle.

                  Money is considered aid, always has been.

                  • GoodEye8@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    I’m not the one ignoring larger points to focus on some irrelevant gray area. Once again, if you want to die on the hill of technicality go ahead, money is aid. Now unless you’re going to address what I’ve already brought up multiple times kindly fuck off.