Flying Squid@lemmy.world to Political Memes@lemmy.world · il y a 3 ansWe live in the future!lemmy.worldimagemessage-square303fedilinkarrow-up11.77Kcross-posted to: programmer_humor@programming.dev
arrow-up11.77KimageWe live in the future!lemmy.worldFlying Squid@lemmy.world to Political Memes@lemmy.world · il y a 3 ansmessage-square303fedilinkcross-posted to: programmer_humor@programming.dev
minus-squarePatapon Enjoyer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up190·il y a 3 ansPersonally I’m a fan of fake certificate that says you paid money for one of the plagiarism machine’s works
minus-square🐑🇸 🇭 🇪 🇪 🇵 🇱 🇪🐑@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up40·il y a 3 ansYou mean the Amazon rain forest destroyer machine?
minus-squarealekwithak@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up12·edit-2il y a 3 ansHate this argument. No one ever discusses Fiat currency’s environmental impact. *Which includes literally, actually destroying the Amazon rainforest.
minus-squareevanuggetpi@lemmy.nzlinkfedilinkarrow-up35·il y a 3 ansWhataboutism. Bitcoin does not need to be proof of work. It’s horrendously inefficient.
minus-squarecommie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·il y a 3 ansBitcoin does need to be proof of work. any system without that isn’t bitcoin.
minus-squareevanuggetpi@lemmy.nzlinkfedilinkarrow-up10·il y a 3 ansIs Ethereum any less Ethereum since moving to PoS? Of course not.
minus-squarecommie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·il y a 3 ansethereum also has no supply cap. they are different technologies almost entirely. i would not call PoS bitcoin anything except p.o.s. there is still a pow blockchain running for ethereum, and there would be for bitcoin, too, and that is the blockchain i would call bitcoin.
minus-squareAabbcc@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up10·il y a 3 ansThey talk about it all the time and the impact is much, much less.
minus-squareEmerald (she/her)@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7·il y a 3 ansAnd not all crypto is proof of work, some is proof of stake, which actually isn’t too bad environmentally
minus-squareMotoAsh@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up34·il y a 3 ansNahh, NFTs deserve to be their own failure. Cryptobros get two fails for one tech.
minus-squareirmoz@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·il y a 3 ansThat doesn’t contradict the fact that crypto is fake money
minus-squarecommie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·il y a 3 ansit’s not fake if people accept it.
minus-squarecommie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·il y a 3 ansno, because some people accept it
minus-squareMotoAsh@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·il y a 3 ansYou should try reading comprehension, because not only did I NOT say crypto is real money, but I specifically said it’s a failure from the same tech.
minus-squareirmoz@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·il y a 3 ansDude. I didn’t claim you called crypto real money. I’m insinuating you misinterpreted the previous comment. Maybe cool down your projector.
minus-squarehavid_dume@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up3·il y a 3 ansThat’s fair enough, but idk if anyone’s purchased an nft with anything but crypto.
Personally I’m a fan of fake certificate that says you paid money for one of the plagiarism machine’s works
You mean the Amazon rain forest destroyer machine?
Hate this argument. No one ever discusses Fiat currency’s environmental impact.
*Which includes literally, actually destroying the Amazon rainforest.
Whataboutism. Bitcoin does not need to be proof of work. It’s horrendously inefficient.
Bitcoin does need to be proof of work. any system without that isn’t bitcoin.
Is Ethereum any less Ethereum since moving to PoS? Of course not.
ethereum also has no supply cap. they are different technologies almost entirely.
i would not call PoS bitcoin anything except p.o.s.
there is still a pow blockchain running for ethereum, and there would be for bitcoin, too, and that is the blockchain i would call bitcoin.
They talk about it all the time and the impact is much, much less.
And not all crypto is proof of work, some is proof of stake, which actually isn’t too bad environmentally
* fake money
Nahh, NFTs deserve to be their own failure. Cryptobros get two fails for one tech.
That doesn’t contradict the fact that crypto is fake money
it’s not fake if people accept it.
So you’re saying it’s fake?
no, because some people accept it
Fair point
You should try reading comprehension, because not only did I NOT say crypto is real money, but I specifically said it’s a failure from the same tech.
Dude. I didn’t claim you called crypto real money. I’m insinuating you misinterpreted the previous comment. Maybe cool down your projector.
That’s fair enough, but idk if anyone’s purchased an nft with anything but crypto.
Do you mean Schrodinger’s artwork?