• dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      He (probably will be) the executive branch of the government. Unless his orders illegally suspend constitutional rights, the military must follow their CICs orders.

      Edit: for all of the downvoters, what about Trump’s plan to deploy troops on American soil is illegal?

      • DrPop
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not necessarily, the American military operates on chain of command. The worry is the current blocking of military appointments over bullshit. If they can steal long enough trump can install people who will follow his orders. Otherwise you can deny an unlawful order. Trump can only give orders to those ranked immediately below him.

        • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Okay, so hypothetical situation, Trump makes an illegal order to General so-and-so. General refuses to comply. Trump has that General removed and replaced with a sycophant. In this actual case, he’s saying he’ll deploy troops on the ground on American soil, which I don’t believe is an illegal order.

          • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Believe Hayes made it illegal. There a few exclusions though, if I remember correct, an insurrection was one of the exclusions. I imagine Desantis knew this when he stated he would put troops on the other side of the border in Mexico, not realizing that would clearly look/be an invasion of Mexico. Or realizing and being dumb enough to think that was a smart move.

      • hansl@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        1 year ago

        There are precedent for not following illegal orders. The Nuremberg trials made that point very clear.

        • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          The Nuremberg trials were only allowed to happen because of how badly the Nazis were beaten at the end of WW2. They also didn’t possess nuclear weapons. If the Americans were about to critically lose a war like the Nazis did, to the point where they would be standing trial for warcrimes a la the Nuremberg Trials, they would probably detonate their arsenal.

          Also, is it illegal to deploy troops on your own soil? I wasn’t aware of that rule.

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You’re assuming it’s illegal. I’m pretty sure the commander-in-chief can declare various types of emergencies and deploy a response, at will. The potentially illegal part is theres usually limits, including very short time periods, unless congress ratifies the choice. Then who’s in half of congress is so far up Trump’s ass, they’d ratify covfefe

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        Fun fact, deploying troops inside the US is very restricted without an act of Congress to create an exception to the Posse Comitatus Act. Unless he tries to invoke the insurrection act. But at that point he would be asking the military to suspend civil law and order in an area. And that’s absolutely something that requires the military to consent to doing.