• mhague@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    What’s the point of thinking of our government as “the government”? Or changing “We could solve this.” to “They could solve this.”?

    • AlwaysNowNeverNotMe@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      11 months ago

      Because the government has on multiple occasions during my lifetime refused to consider measures with over 90% popular support.

      Because they do not serve us as it is written in the Constitution. They serve the wealthy, they bend and scrape and lick their boots, never hold them accountable to the law, and never. Ever. Act against their best interest in any scenario. And the wealthy benefit from the social safety net having a big hole above a pit trap their workers are afraid to fall into.

      • mhague@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        Our leaders serve the people making noise at the bargaining table. We the people have the most power. We just leave after the first victory. We don’t become educated voters and choose to instead focus on exciting narratives. Elite interests try to affect change and so focus on reality. We the people seem to be after catharsis and so focus on symbolic victories.

        But what can you expect from people who constantly tell themselves they have no power? No agency? They don’t conceptualize themselves as being able to affect change and it colors everything they do.

        • pearable@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          You’re judging the majority of the population without questioning why we feel powerless. The vast majority of news, media, and education we encounter support our oppression.

          Just because you’ve been lucky enough to hear the truth and been in the right place emotionally to hear it doesn’t mean you should write everyone who is ignorant as morally inferior.

          • mhague@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            I’m not judging, I’m curious about why people say this stuff. The way we talk is intimately tied with results. Changing rhetoric is a big step in getting girls to conceptualize themselves as capable of “boy” things. “Chess is for boys.” isn’t just a phrase, it’s like a spell that alters reality. If people can understand how words have power when it comes to women’s opportunites, or minorities taking interest in voting, then they’ll eventually understand that it affects our agency too.

    • gregorum@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Oy. Arguing with nihilists is about as useful as pissing into a black hole. You’ll just get your dick turned into spaghetti for the effort, so why bother?

      • mhague@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        All I care about is that people can see what kind of mentality pairs with rhetoric like, “They control us!” It’s not a productive, insightful perspective that speaks helplessness into themselves and others.