• chitak166@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    11 months ago

    The disparity in wealth should grow instead of shrink.

    As long as most people believe this, then that’s what’s going to happen.

    • SCB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Wealth disparity is not relevant to this discussion. It doesn’t say anything about where the bottom tier is.

      If we had full UBI, free homes, free food, free healthcare, etc and some small portion of the country were quadrillionaires, we’d have massive wealth disparity and no loss of quality of life.

      Wealth is not zero-sum, and the high and low do not necessarily have anything to do with one another.

        • SCB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          It’s not a take. This is just correct information that you don’t like. There is 0 opinion in the above.

          • chitak166@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            11 months ago

            You would be delusional enough to believe that.

            It’s okay, I’m going to put you on my ignore list now. You’re not worth arguing with because every post you make is asinine.

            Goodbye.

      • zbyte64@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        The rich people who go on TV and say “people don’t want to work for me anymore, that’s why we need to cut benefits” certainly see wealth as zero-sum. They know if we had all those things you listed their business would stop working.

        • SCB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Or they’re lying for their own gain

          Also this is a question of incentives, not wealth. They believe people who get benefits are incentivized not to work. This has been proven soundly false in recent tests of UBI.

              • zbyte64@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                They get elected to office to do what exactly? I hear they have the wildest orgies.

                But seriously, politicians serve money to make money. So I don’t see how this dodges the point.

                • SCB@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  Politicians serve their constituents - they consistently vote in the way their constituents want, and in the last 6 years the Republican Party has been turned inside out by those constituents.

                  It’s impossible to argue otherwise in the face of the very real power people wield, from primarying their representatives to taking over local school boards.