• Gigan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    1 year ago

    But now your responsible, climate-concerned genes have been removed from the gene-pool.

    • magnetosphere@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I’m not going to force children to live in a future I have no faith in just so I can say I’m part of the “gene pool”. It’s unfair to make them pay the costs for several lifetimes of greed and irresponsibility. To me, that’s exceptionally arrogant and cruel.

      I hope I’m wrong, but I’m not willing to bet my child’s future on that.

      • Gigan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m worried about an Idiocracy scenario. If all the people that care about the climate and environment decide that not having kids is a solution, we’re just going to be left with all the irresponsible idiots reproducing. It’s like choosing not to vote because you don’t like either candidate.

        • Captainvaqina@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          1 year ago

          We’re already in the idiocracy scenario.

          Except instead of President Dwayne Elizondo Mountain Dew Comacho, we have a confirmed fascist traitor running for office.

          • Gigan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah, but he lost last time. And if you say we’re in the Idiocracy scenario already, what does that say about the current president?

        • iheartneopets@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          1 year ago

          That argument smacks dangerously of eugenics. Conservative and religious parents have leftist and atheist kids all the time. My spouse and I are both from families like that, and won’t be teaching our kids those values because they’re bat shit.

          You can see how both ideologies are self defeating in how the rates of practicing Christians in the US is dwindling, and the ultra conservative base is aging faster than they’re being replaced. That’s why they’re pushing abortion and gutting school systems so hard. The only way they replinish their numbers is through force and sabotage.

      • ribboo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Very few people who live, regret having lived. That is, even people who go through the toughest of times. I’d pick being born today in a lower income family, over not being born, 100 times out of 100.

        If you feel like you’ll be a capable parent, it is not at all cruel.

        • Chobbes@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t know if this is as true as you think. There are plenty of people who don’t want to be here and don’t particularly enjoy life. I think it’s kind of hard to know how many people feel this way too because it’s a bit of a taboo subject. I wouldn’t say “very few” though, you’ve probably met several such people even if you didn’t know.

    • uphillbothways@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      Good. Humans are a trash fire and I wish them all that they deserve. I no longer consider myself part of their species. They’re not fit to breed with.

        • uphillbothways@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          @Tavarin said: Sorry, but you’re still human. Enjoy the crap with the rest of us.

          ^ Exhibit A: Humans love to explain away and invalidate the sexual choices of members of their social groups. Just one way in which they are terrible with far too great of frequency.

          Wikipedia defines species thusly: “A species (pl. species) is often defined as the largest group of organisms in which any two individuals of the appropriate sexes or mating types can produce fertile offspring, typically by sexual reproduction.”

          I have rejected requests to procreate with several partners (including one who became my spouse given those conditions) and had my ability to reproduce sexually removed surgically. I can no longer produce fertile offspring with other humans. But, you probably just enjoy telling people their choices are invalid and that they don’t/shouldn’t have agency over their own bodies…
          Bye.

          • Tavarin@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            21
            ·
            1 year ago

            Sorry, you’re still human.

            Infertile members of a species are still part of that species, even if they don’t contribute to it’s continuation.

            Enjoy being human, because you are one.

            • T0RB1T@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              12
              ·
              1 year ago

              Scary to imagine that someone out there might actually believe that if we forcibly sterilized a group of individuals, we are (not only committing a heinous and evil act, but also) removing their status as a human being.

              • Tavarin@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                9
                ·
                1 year ago

                Yeah, that is just absurd and downright scary logic they are trying to employ.

              • uphillbothways@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Forcibly for others is obviously unacceptable and has nothing to do with anything I said. I was talking about voluntarily disassociating myself from a violent and catastrophic species. You’re deranged to suggest my words contained any other insinuation.

                • T0RB1T@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  You didn’t need to insinuate anything intentionally.

                  If you choose to define someone’s humanity as their ability to procreate… You’re already, intentionally or otherwise, laying extremely dangerous groundwork.

                  The exact same kinds of reasoning people have always used to dehumanize others.

                  I don’t have to assume anything about who you are in your heart to tell you that you are employing bad and dangerous logic. Maybe you’re a saint, maybe every day you do 1000 times more good than I could do in a lifetime.

                  Doesn’t matter.

                  It’s still bad logic.

          • LemmysMum@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Humans, or modern humans (Homo sapiens or H. sapiens), are the most common and widespread species of primate. A great ape characterized by their hairlessness, bipedalism, and high intelligence, humans have large brains, enabling more advanced cognitive skills

            Huh, you might be right.

    • Pretzilla@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Progeny are highly unpredictable and rebellious anyway

      Adoption, teaching others that aren’t your blood relatives, are viable