Stamets@lemmy.world to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · il y a 3 ansThe dreamlemmy.worldimagemessage-square249fedilinkarrow-up12K
arrow-up12KimageThe dreamlemmy.worldStamets@lemmy.world to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · il y a 3 ansmessage-square249fedilink
minus-squareschmidtster@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·il y a 3 ansIs that not a type of AI already?
minus-squarelad@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·il y a 3 ansWell, there’s an argument over not calling machine learning AI in this very thread, so… ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
minus-squareschmidtster@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·il y a 3 ansSo why suggest it for the catch all term for AI when it’s only one portion of the argument itself? Such a strange suggestion,
minus-squareTheGreenGolem@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·il y a 3 ansGlorified chatbots. Tops. But definitely not something with any kind of intelligence.
minus-squareParetoOptimalDev@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkarrow-up2·edit-2il y a 2 ansYesterday I prompted gpt4 to convert a power shell script to Haskell. It did it in one shot. This happens more and more frequently for me. I don’t want to oversell llms, but you are definitely underselling them.
Machine learning?
Is that not a type of AI already?
Well, there’s an argument over not calling machine learning AI in this very thread, so… ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
So why suggest it for the catch all term for AI when it’s only one portion of the argument itself? Such a strange suggestion,
Glorified chatbots. Tops. But definitely not something with any kind of intelligence.
Yesterday I prompted gpt4 to convert a power shell script to Haskell. It did it in one shot. This happens more and more frequently for me.
I don’t want to oversell llms, but you are definitely underselling them.