Parks Canada is warning drivers not to stop while on highways to let moose lick their cars this winter.

The peculiar message comes as moose have been trekking onto highways to lick salt off of roads and passing vehicles, says Tracy McKay with Parks Canada.

“It does sound very funny … It’s okay to laugh at it, as long as people drive responsibly and do what’s best for the wildlife,” she said.

McKay says Parks Canada puts out a warning every winter as moose venture down to highways to fuel their salt intake.

“Unfortunately, this kind of puts [moose] at risk of being injured or killed if they get hit by a vehicle,” she said.

“Parks Canada understands that seeing those wildlife is a real highlight for a lot of people, but we ask people not to stop … so that the moose can’t get used to licking salt off of the cars.”

  • schmidtster@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    11 months ago

    It’s not, but peoples would use them, it’s not inherently illegal to shoot a deer at a farmers cow lick, but it’s obviously against the spirit of hunting. These would also attract more than just moose as well, so predators would change habits and could use them for easy kills too.

    • voracitude@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      You’re absolutely right about the predators - I had figured moose and other prey animals would go in herds, which is typically how they defend themselves from predators. Lazy hunters are another story; while I’m sure there are ways to set up monitoring to discourage people from doing it, it’s also indisputably true that if you give anyone a system they’ll learn to game it.

      I appreciate the discussion, by the way. This is one of my favourite ways to learn new things 🙌

      • schmidtster@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Yeah I think it’s opening an interesting can of worms. Unless they amend the laws, it wouldn’t be illegal for them to use them, but changing them and than patrolling them could be considered entrapment. Or at least it would be tested in court and decided there.

    • NoIWontPickaName@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      See, I don’t believe that hunting over bait or hunting over a salt lick is any worse than just shooting in a tree stand.

      At least you’re putting in the effort and shit.

      With a tree stand, all you do is put it up once and then go sit in the motherfucker, with bait you have to put that shit out over and over, saltbox not so much.

      It’s a constant maintenance kind of deal

      • schmidtster@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        11 months ago

        It makes it too easy and will lead to over hunting. Hunting is as much about forest management as it is for sport and food. Tree stand you still need to be a decent shot.

        Get 5 or 6 deer at a salt lick standing around, almost anyone could hit them with a bow or cross bow. Baiting is just too easy and takes all the fun and sport from it.

        • girlfreddy@lemmy.caOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          Baiting is just too easy and takes all the fun and sport from it.

          Yet it’s allowed for bears (in ON anyway).

          sigh

          • schmidtster@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            Now that you mention it… I do believe there is some exceptions even here for the rare lottery ones. 3 bear tags for example or other predators that are in large amounts you do want those taken down regardless type of thing for management reasons.

            But at that point it’s not exactly “hunting” more culling they would argue.

            These are decades old convos with my old supervisor i am relying on here, so not exactly recalling the super specific details.