I literally do blame the Democrats for Trump, and if you don’t, you weren’t paying attention.

Plenty of us were critiquing Clinton’s campaign on those merits and were consistently talked down to in shocker the same way we’re being talked down to now. Shocker, she lost. I remember saying a few weeks before the election “We’re about to get Brexited.” I put my vote down for Clinton, because Trump is fucking insane, and that was clear before he was President. It was clear in the fucking 1980’s.

Being able to critique our leaders is supposed to be what is the difference between us and conservative voters. They’re the cult who unquestioningly believes all the bullshit that comes out of Trump’s mouth and diapers. I find it weird that people think we should be more like them in regards to our leaders like that would be a good thing.

  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    11 months ago

    the federal government has very little ability to change abortion policy

    They had the votes to pass the legislation that would federally guarantee a woman’s right to an abortion and they choose not to include it.

    They had the ability to tie access to legal abortion to federal Medicare/caid funding, and they choose not to do it.

    They had the momentum to put a constitutional amendment on state ballots - in much the same way Bush used “traditional family” amendments to put gay marriage legalization on the ballot in 2004 - and they refused.

    They have the ability - RIGHT NOW - to pass state laws that will shield women and doctors from interstate prosecutions and they are refusing to do it.

    A constitutional amendment is the only other way it could be done

    An amendment is certainly one way it could be done. An interstate compact is another. Federal public money and legal protection for physicians is a third way. There are still others. None have been tried. None are being pursued. None appear to be a part of the 2024 election agenda.

    • HandBreadedTools@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      SCOTUS can tell Congress to go fuck itself for literally any reason. Passing a law saying abortion cannot be made illegal by a state would have done literally NOTHING to stop Dobbs.

      I am so sick of seeing this false rhetoric all over Lemmy, the only thing that would have stopped Dobbs would have been a constitutional amendment.

      • ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        A law passed by congress would have set an entirely different framework thus eliminating the grounds Dobbs relied on. I am pretty sure the justices were pretty clear in the Dobbs decision itself about that.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        SCOTUS can tell Congress to go fuck itself for literally any reason.

        Yes. But then that reason sets off a series of dominoes, as it applies to a whole host of outstanding case law. The reason the SCOTUS gives is incredibly important and not something trivially decided.

        Passing a law saying abortion cannot be made illegal

        Would have overriden a host of state trigger-laws already on the books, forcing the states to re-litigate at the state level and offer liberals ample opportunity to stonewall new legislation in a host of states.

        I am so sick of seeing this false rhetoric

        Democrats crying that they are powerless while insisting that Republicans are omnipotent is the false rhetoric.

        “Government can’t help you, it can only hurt you” is this toxic and corrosive theory that gives license to the worst kind of people to continue doing the most nightmarish things to their neighbors.