• NewPerspective@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    85
    ·
    10 months ago

    I hope Game Freak sees this as a wake up call. People will kill for a Pokemon game with a little innovation.

    • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      61
      ·
      10 months ago

      Why would they? It takes effort to make something innovative. They can make buckets of money by doing nothing. They might make more, but it’s going to cost a lot more too.

      • Renacles@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        10 months ago

        This game literally cost 6 million though, that’s nothing to the Pokemon company.

    • SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      10 months ago

      Pokemon Arceus had a little innovation. The thing is: a little innovation after decades of doing the same thing is like a textbook example of “too little, too late”.

    • Lvxferre@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      10 months ago

      I don’t think that GameFreak will see this as a wake up call. And even if it does, it might not do the necessary changes to Pokémon main series.

      The stagnation runs deeper. It is partially caused by inertia (“we’re selling well, why bother innovating?”), but also by GF’s insistence on making the main series story-driven instead of gameplay-driven. Even if story-driven Pokémon goes a lot against the franchise’s biggest strength - a wide, unique, and immersive universe to explore.

        • TheQuietCroc@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          10 months ago

          That’s the point. Pokemon could be successful in the same way but they’re saying Game Freak doesn’t want to change how they do things.

        • Lvxferre@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          10 months ago

          Because it’s gameplay-driven.

          There’s no Rotom bossing you around. No “sit down you player, as we tell you what’s supposed to be your story”. No unnecessary broken bridges forcing story linearity. The story that you see in this sort of game is the one that you build as you interact with the game, not the one that the developer wants you to watch.

      • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        More importantly: The Pokemon Company is a separate entity from Game Freak and Nintendo, with a third company also participating, Creatures Inc.

        Pokemon games exist solely to drive people, especially the current younger generation, into the franchise. Licensed merchandise is THE money printer for them. In 2022, they reported 11.6 billion dollars in revenue just from that. They’re at a point where they can literally ask “Why even bother with games?”

    • BruceTwarzen@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      People like cathing cool animals and do thing with them valling it a pokemon like game is just weird. No one called pokemon final fantasy with animals.

      • Meowoem@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        Yeah it’s obviously like Pokémon in several key regards but from what I’ve seen of it the actual game has a lot of originality and new concepts. We shouldn’t need to completely reinvent everything all the time, when something has a big cultural impact on people as children they should be allowed to play with and evolve those concepts - I know Pokémon doesn’t understand how evolution works but we as a society should take our cultural property seriously.

        If you shove your ideas into kids brains then the adults who grow from those kids should own those ideas, the only reason we don’t is because Disney wanted a monopoly on mouse picture.

        Set copyright to something reasonable like twenty years and focus on making a better society with free growth of ideas and expression rather than protecting the profits of the richest few

        • Cethin@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Honestly, I don’t think it has any original concepts, but it does merge a lot of concepts from other games into a fairly cohesive package. There’s nothing it does, from what I’ve seen, that isn’t done in another game, but the fact that all systems connect with each other and work together is fairly impressive.

      • mako@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        With the chosen name of “sheeple” I’m guessing you get upset at just about anything a majority of people enjoy.