• TheFriar@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      10 months ago

      To be fair, this isn’t just a problem with not recognizing satire, but it is a problem with shitty websites that are nothing more than vectors for an absolute megafuck ton of ads. That site was 100% garbage. And more websites are fusing articles together under what appear to be subheadings but are actually whole ass titles.

      • WarmSoda@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Wow. Anyone else want to write way too much about how they completely missed the joke?

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          Yeah, I agree with the criticism in general, but this one has a comment section below the article. That’s a pretty clear indication that this article has ended.

          Those crappy sites that OP is complaining about don’t have anything separating articles.

        • TheFriar@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Jesus. It’s a sad commentary on how far society has fallen when a small paragraph is considered “writing way too much.” And I wasn’t the person you initially replied to. I didn’t even read the article because the site was such a cancer. I opened reader and it ended up opening a different article so I just bailed on the whole thing. I was adding to the conversation by talking a little about he trend I’ve noticed to rope people into spending more time on sites (read: getting more ad money). Although, I’m sure I’ve lost you at this point in this novel of a paragraph, so I might as well be saying “blah blah blah blah”