cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/14097254

Smith’s execution by “nitrogen hypoxia” took around 22 minutes, according to media witnesses, who were led into a viewing room at the William C Holman correctional facility in Atmore shortly before 8 pm local time.

After the nitrogen gas began flowing, Smith convulsed on the gurney for several minutes. The state had previously said the nitrogen gas would cause Smith to lose consciousness in seconds and die within minutes, according to the Associated Press.

“I’ve been to four previous executions and I’ve never seen a condemned inmate thrash in the way that Kenneth Smith reacted to the nitrogen gas,” Lee Hedgepeth, a journalist who witnessed the execution, told the BBC’s Newsday programme.

  • ninjan@lemmy.mildgrim.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    If you redefine torture into any form of discomfort sure. But that is not what the word means.

    “the action or practice of inflicting severe pain or suffering on someone as a punishment or in order to force them to do or say something.”

    So solitary is for sure torture. Normal prison shouldn’t be but can for sure be in some cases. It’s only slightly better than the corporeal punishments (lashes, stockade) of old in my opinion.

    How would actually killing someone, with the person being killed being fully aware that it happens, as it happens. Not be “externally applied methods of torture”? Asphyxiation has been used as a method of torture for millennia.

    • limonfiesta@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      You realize that my questions were rhetorical, right?

      Re-read the comment chain, maybe you meant to reply to someone else?

      • ninjan@lemmy.mildgrim.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        No. I’m saying it’s you who don’t understand what torture means and your “rhetorical questions” are daft and completely unrelated to what anyone in the thread is saying.

        • limonfiesta@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Seeing as these all flow down from my original response, I’m pretty sure it’s you who doesn’t understand the context of the conversation.

          Also, the torture in question wasn’t the execution method. So again, I suggest you re-read the comment thread.

    • ObsidianBreaks@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I’d argue that depending on the victim that ‘any form’ of discomfort could be considered torture. What should define torture isn’t a ‘commonly accepted idea of torture’ but what the victim considers torture. Some people are quite fine with not having any company for example, but other people if they were socially isolated would consider this a torture, especially for a protracted period of time.