• Mardoniush [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    11 months ago

    The definition of a “humane” death for these ghouls isn’t “kills quickly and painlessly” it’s “looks like it does to observers”. Obviously the most humane way of killing someone is hitting them with a 200 ton block of stone accelerated to well above terminal velocity. But no one wants to clean up the mess.

    Giving someone a morphine overdose might cause the person to throw up and that’s gooey so it wont be done.

    • Philosoraptor [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      11 months ago

      I think the possibility that it might actually be pleasurable–even if only for a few seconds–also puts us off of it. Two of the stated purposes of the death penalty in the United States are deterrence and punishment. A method that has the potential to feel good for the condemned wouldn’t satisfy the bloodthirsty hogs enough. There are a lot of people who would bring back drawing and quartering, if given the option.

      • ImOnADiet@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        yeah i always wondered why thye dont just make you overdose on like heroin or something like that