BuddyTheBeefalo@lemmy.ml to Data Is Beautiful@lemmy.ml · 1 年前New gender gaplemmy.mlimagemessage-square398fedilinkarrow-up1630
arrow-up1630imageNew gender gaplemmy.mlBuddyTheBeefalo@lemmy.ml to Data Is Beautiful@lemmy.ml · 1 年前message-square398fedilink
minus-squarepeople_are_cute@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 年前It very literally is, in South Korea’s case.
minus-squareHawke@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 年前How so? Beginning to conscript women as well as men does not equate to abolishing the military, or am I missing something?
minus-squareExosus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 年前What? Do you want half the army shopping for new shoes to wear in the trenches while the other half has to wait for them at the shopping mall fountain?
minus-squareCowbee [he/they]@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 年前Were you trying to be funny, or is that your genuine understanding of women in the millitary?
minus-squareOsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 年前They could conscript women, but you can imagine how hard it would be for that legislation to pass.
It very literally is, in South Korea’s case.
How so?
Beginning to conscript women as well as men does not equate to abolishing the military, or am I missing something?
What? Do you want half the army shopping for new shoes to wear in the trenches while the other half has to wait for them at the shopping mall fountain?
Were you trying to be funny, or is that your genuine understanding of women in the millitary?
They could conscript women, but you can imagine how hard it would be for that legislation to pass.