
Regarding the idea of IP theft, I think it’s more complicated.
Let’s say you buy a book, learn from it, and use that knowledge to your benefit. We don’t think of this as stealing, even though you didn’t buy the knowledge, you only bought the text.
If you borrow a book, likewise the knowledge is yours, not just while you’ve borrowed the book. Even if you pirate or steal the book (please don’t), the knowledge is still yours regardless.
So I don’t think there should be an issue of an AI learning freely from content.
However, I would agree that when it reproduces a work without attribution that it becomes a problem. The problem that we as a society have even when AI is not involved is defining where that line is. Because there are cases where some kinds of reproduction are ok (parody, homage, etc.). We as a society do not have clear rules for these things because it is hard to define those rules. That’s our problem, not a problem with AI. Using AI just makes it too easy for someone to cross that line and therefore I find it risky to use it for the production of that kind of material.
But I do not think it’s an issue for me to ask the AI how to do some unusual thing in the terminal or to refactor a part of my code to work a little differently. There is no harm in asking it to create a GUI version of the cli program that I made.
As for putting people out of jobs, we may be at an inflection point in our productivity curve. Historically, these have caused short term job loss but ultimately lead to improvements generally once we’ve had time to adjust once people learn how to leverage these tools effectively. Likely, it will create more jobs in new areas.
Humans will always use more resources, especially energy. Until the last few decades the source of thst energy wasn’t concerning. Now it is and we need to find more ways to produce more energy cleanly. Arguing for less energy use is never going to work. We will always use more energy.






I think it’s Rinoa from FF8 which released earlier in 1999.