CleverOleg [he/him]

  • 20 Posts
  • 337 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: May 18th, 2023

help-circle
  • Libs cannot imagine that the Cuban people support the revolution.

    I just finished reading Helen Yaffe’s Che Guevara: The Economics of Revolution, which documents Che’s time as head of MININD in Cuba as well as his economic ideas. One thing that is clear is that Che thought you need to develop that revolutionary consciousness in the people even in the earliest stages of the transition to socialism. I was a bit skeptical - not because that’s not important, but because it seems like idealism to me to think you can change hearts and minds (the superstructure) while development of the socialist base is just starting the transition away from capitalism.

    But then again, the people of Cuba do seem to fully back the revolution, and to this day Cuba is communist. Meanwhile, folks in the Eastern Bloc were envious of westerners who had rock music and blue jeans, and they have capitulated to capitalism (I know the abandonment of communism in the Eastern Bloc is more complicated than that, but I do think there certainly was a lack of revolutionary spirit was a contributing factor even if it wasn’t the main factor). So clearly I think Che was on to something.


















  • I have actually found the “tankie” moniker to be useful IRL:

    Tell someone you’re a Marxist-Leninist and you just get a blank stare.

    Tell someone you’re a socialist and they think you mean you’re simpatico with AOC and Bernie.

    Tell someone you’re a communist and they will just shut down and not hear anything else you say.

    But “tankie” seems to convey enough truth - that you support past and current efforts from AES states to build socialism - to be useful.



  • Maybe an unpopular opinion but I think Russia should (and probably will) see it more as a red guideline or at the very least not respond in an equivalent way, just enough to express displeasure.

    It’s the right move too IMO because Russia is winning and winning at a pace not yet seen before. To use a sports analogy, what NATO is doing now is the thing where you’re down 2-0 and time is running out; so you start chirping at the other team and playing dirty to get them off their game and maybe get them to draw a foul. Of course the right thing for the team in the lead is to swallow your pride and ignore it; stay on your game because if you do, you win. The only way Russia can lose right now is if NATO gets significantly more involved, and they can’t do that without some sort of fig leaf casus belli. That’s what NATO is trying to do with the DPRK troops thing, but rightly no one is buying it. Russia cannot give NATO anything they can use as a reason to get involved.